Openai/6930aca4-ddd4-800f-83d0-401388219fbc

This conversation was exported from ChatGPT

gpt-5-t-mini

User: Please give me information about BG Wealth Sharing https://bg662.com/ based off their website and anything else you can…

Please give me information about BG Wealth Sharing (https://bg662.com/) based off their website and anything else you can find online.

Are they reputable?

Would you invest money with them?

How long have they been in existence?

Assistant: Short answer up front: I would not trust BG Wealth Sharing bg662.com and I would not invest with them.

Short answer up front: I would not trust BG Wealth Sharing (bg662.com) and I would not invest with them. Below I summarize what the company’s website says, independent evidence I found (including regulator warnings and multiple scam reports), the main red flags, and practical next steps if you’ve already sent money.

1. UK regulator (FCA) has issued a formal warning naming “BG Wealth Sharing / dsjex.net” and telling people to avoid dealing with them — the FCA explicitly says the firm is not authorised and may be targeting UK residents. That’s an authoritative red flag. FCA

1. Multiple consumer-safety / scam-check sites and security scanners flag bg662.com / DSJ Exchange as suspicious or high-risk (very low trust scores on ScamDoc / ScamAdviser / Gridinsoft / Scam-Detector-style sites). These services note very recent domain registration, hidden WHOIS, and other typical scam indicators. Scamdoc
2. Several crypto/broker-review sites and investigators recommend avoiding DSJ Exchange (the trading platform the BG site promotes) because it is unregulated by top-tier regulators and shows common scam behavior (unverifiable licences, manipulated balances, withdrawal problems). BrokerChooser
3. User reports, Reddit threads and social-media posts describe people being recruited via WhatsApp/Telegram, controlled trading dashboards, small initial withdrawals followed by freezes/requests for more money — classic scam/MLM tactics. People name “Professor Stephen Beard” and DSJ domains repeatedly in anecdotal complaints. Reddit

- Regulator warning. The FCA warning (May 7, 2025) is the single strongest signal to avoid the firm. FCA

• Unverified / contradictory claims on their own site. The site claims to be a subsidiary of large “Investing” platforms and to hold multiple high-level licences (SEC, ASIC, MAS, DFSA, etc.) — but those claims are not corroborated by the regulators or independent records cited above. That inconsistency is a classic fraud sign. BG662
• Domain / trust-score issues. Security scanners and scam-checkers rate bg662.com very low or suspicious and report recent domain registration / privacy-protected WHOIS. Short domain age + hidden ownership is suspicious for a financial firm. Scamdoc
• Community reports of withdrawal freezes / pressure to add funds and recruit others. Multiple forum threads and third-party reviews describe exactly that pattern. Reddit

- What the site claims: BG’s site says it was founded in 2018 and that DSJ Exchange was founded April 2022. (Those are self-reported claims on bg662.com.) BG662

• What independent sources show / contradict those claims: Domain- and scam-scanner records show the bg662 domain is very new and has low trust scores; DSJ Exchange/related domains have been the subject of regulatory warnings and consumer complaints starting in 2024–2025. That means the public footprint people can verify is recent and is associated with scam warnings (so the site’s “founded in 2018 / big-exchange” claims are not independently backed and are suspicious). Scamdoc

- No. Not reputable. The combination of an FCA warning, many independent scam reports and review pages, unverifiable licence/exec claims on their own website, and domain/trust-score problems means they do not pass basic checks for a legitimate investment firm. FCA

• I would not invest any money with them. If you want to invest in crypto or trading platforms, choose firms registered with and regulated by recognized authorities (SEC/FINRA for US broker/dealers, FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, etc.), and verify via the regulators’ public registers.

1. Stop sending more money. Scammers commonly take a little, let you withdraw a small amount, then ask for more or “verification fees.”

1. Document everything (screenshots, chat logs, transaction IDs, wallet addresses, emails).
2. Contact your bank/payment provider immediately — ask about chargebacks or wire-reversal options; if crypto was used, recovery is difficult but report it.
3. Report to authorities: UK — FCA (they already warned on this firm), Australia — ASIC/MoneySmart, New Zealand — FMA, your local police/cybercrime unit, and report the scam on platforms where it recruited (WhatsApp/Telegram groups, social channels). FCA

- Company website — BG Wealth Sharing (company / project pages). BG662

• FCA Warning List: BG Wealth Sharing / dsjex.net (May 7, 2025). FCA
• Scam-check / trust-score pages (ScamDoc / ScamAdviser / Gridinsoft analyses). Scamdoc
• Independent reviews / watchdog posts about DSJ Exchange and BG Wealth Sharing (broker-review sites, BehindMLM-type writeups, Reddit threads reporting scams). BrokerChooser

If you want, I can do any of the following right now (I won’t ask you to wait — I’ll do it immediately):

• Pull the FCA warning page into a clean summary you can forward to someone. FCA
• Check whether any of the claimed licences or executives (e.g., “Stephen Beard”, “DSJ Exchange” licenses) appear in SEC / ASIC / MAS public registries and summarize the results.
• Draft a short message you can send to your bank (or to people in a WhatsApp group) explaining the warning and asking them to stop further transfers.

Which of those would be most useful to you?

User: Does the website below appear to be affiliated to BG Wealth sharing?

Does the website below appear to be affiliated to BG Wealth sharing? Is it a legit website?

https://dsj355.com/pc/#/home

Assistant: Short answer: Yes — dsj355.comhttps://dsj355.com/ appears to be one of the DSJ/“DSJ Exchange” sites that are tied to th…

Short answer: Yes — dsj355.com appears to be one of the DSJ/“DSJ Exchange” sites that are tied to the same network BG Wealth Sharing is connected with, and it does not look legitimate. I would not trust it or invest through it. Below are the reasons and the most important sources.

- Affiliation: Likely affiliated. DSJ-branded domains (dsjex.net, dsjzn.com, and many dsj### variants such as dsj355.com) are repeatedly promoted together in the same marketing channels and social posts and are repeatedly named in consumer complaints about “BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange.” The FCA warning about BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange and multiple community reports all point to a single scam ecosystem using multiple DSJ domains. FCA

• Legitimacy: Not legit. Independent scam-checkers flag dsj355.com as suspicious or a scam; broker-safety reviewers and many user reports warn against DSJ Exchange; regulators (FCA) have explicitly warned about DSJ-related operations. Gridinsoft LLC

1. Regulatory warnings for the DSJ/BG network. The UK FCA has warning entries for BG Wealth Sharing and DSJ Exchange (dsjex.net) — it explicitly says these are not authorised and to avoid them. Even if dsj355.com itself isn’t named on every regulator page, the FCA names DSJ Exchange and BG Wealth Sharing and calls out associated Telegram accounts and domains in that network. That’s the strongest red flag. FCA

1. Multiple DSJ domains and overlapping marketing. Social posts, affiliate posts and community threads show many DSJ domains (dsj355, dsj958, dsjex, dsjzn, etc.) being shared and promoted by the same promoters and Telegram/WhatsApp accounts. That pattern (many near-identical domains) is typical for scam operations which swap domains when one gets blocked. Facebook
2. Poor/hidden WHOIS, very recent registration. Scam-scanners and site-checkers report the WHOIS is privacy-protected and the domain is recently registered — a common sign for fraudulent financial sites (short domain age + obscured ownership). ScamAdviser / similar automated tools flag dsj355 for these reasons. ScamAdviser
3. Independent scam analyses & community reports. GridinSoft, ScamAdviser and many Reddit/YouTube/Blog posts identify DSJ Exchange sites as scams, describe withdrawal freezes, pressure to add funds and recruitment tactics — the same patterns reported for BG Wealth Sharing. Gridinsoft LLC

- Don’t deposit or transfer funds to dsj355.com or any DSJ/“BG Wealth Sharing” links.

• If you (or someone you know) already sent money, document payments, stop further payments, contact the payment provider/bank immediately, and report the case to local police and the relevant financial regulator in your country (for UK victims the FCA is already aware). FCA

- FCA warning: BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange (official regulator warning). FCA

• GridinSoft / site-scan describing dsj355.com as a scam. Gridinsoft LLC
• ScamAdviser page for dsj355.com (domain age hidden WHOIS, low trust indicators). ScamAdviser
• BrokerChooser / Broker-safety review (analysis of DSJ Exchange safety — unregulated). BrokerChooser
• Community threads (Reddit) and exposés that tie DSJ sites to BG Wealth Sharing scams. Reddit

If you want, I can:

• Pull the FCA warning page into a concise, shareable one-page summary you can forward. FCA
• Check whether a specific payment/wallet transaction is likely recoverable and draft a message to your bank or payment provider.
• Search for other DSJ domain variants and provide a short list (so you can block or avoid them).

Which of those would you like me to do right now?

User: Yes

Yes

Assistant: Good — I ran a focused “proof attempt” across company registries, university records, the BG/DSJ sites and independent …

Good — I ran a focused “proof attempt” across company registries, university records, the BG/DSJ sites and independent investigators. Short answer up front:

There is no credible, independently verifiable record that a real person called “Professor Stephen Beard” (with the BG/DSJ biography: Oxford Brookes PhD, ex-Gemini/IMF executive, born 1985) exists. The identity appears to be a marketing persona used by BG/DSJ (very likely fabricated). Below I show exactly what I searched and the strongest pieces of evidence that support that conclusion.

1. BG/DSJ’s own marketing materials - BG’s site and many affiliate pages repeatedly show a “Professor Stephen Beard” biography (born 1985, Oxford Brookes finance degrees, ex-Gemini/IMF) and use his name in testimonials, Zoom events and social posts. This is the source of the claims, not independent verification. bg662.com

1. Independent exposés / investigations - Recent investigative writeups (deep-dive exposés) examined BG Wealth Sharing / DSJEX and concluded “Professor Stephen Beard does not exist outside BG’s own marketing” — they found no academic record, no regulatory filings tied to him, and allege the photos/biography are fabricated or AI/stock-based. This is a high-quality red flag because investigators checked primary records. Danny de Hek
2. Social, forum and victim reports - Multiple Reddit / Facebook / Instagram posts and victim threads discuss “Professor Beard” as a promotional persona and explicitly say they cannot find a verifiable background (no LinkedIn, no publications, no verifiable university ties). Many users report behavior consistent with an MLM/ponzi scheme where the “professor” issues signals and controls participation. These are firsthand user reports showing the name exists mainly as marketing. Reddit
3. Public records / corporate registers - I searched UK Companies House and other registries for a matching senior/academic person with that name and the claimed background. There are multiple people called Stephen Beard in Companies House records (common name) but none match BG’s specific biography (born 1985, Oxford Brookes PhD, ex-Gemini/IMF, “Professor” title). In other words, there are real Stephen Beards in corporate records, but none that corroborate BG’s story. That mismatch is important — BG’s biography is not supported by official public-record hits. beta.companieshouse.gov.uk
4. Photo / media provenance and suspicious patterns - Investigators and community posts have traced photos and messages used for “Beard” to stock/affiliate pages and to content that looks AI-generated or recycled (another signal that the persona may be constructed rather than a real public figure). The domain-rotation, privacy WHOIS and heavy use of social recruitment are consistent with scam operations that invent leaders. Danny de Hek

- BG/DSJ is the only place that publishes the detailed Beard biography; independent sources (universities, regulators, corporate registries and credible professional networks) do not corroborate it. bg662.com

• Investigative writeups conclude the Beard identity is likely fabricated and point to AI/stock images and fake certificates used by BG/DSJ. That’s a strong indicator of deliberate deception. Danny de Hek
• Forum/victim reports show the name functions as a marketing/authority figure inside the scheme (Zooms, Bonchat signals, Telegram/WhatsApp recruitment) rather than as a verifiable independent expert. Reddit

- Most likely: “Professor Stephen Beard” is a manufactured/fictitious persona used by BG Wealth Sharing / DSJEX to lend credibility. There is no reliable, independent evidence that a real Professor Stephen Beard with the BG-claimed CV exists.

• Implication: The “founder” story should not be treated as evidence of legitimacy — it’s a marketing device common in scams.

- I can pull and save screenshots of the BG pages that show the Beard biography and the independent exposés (useful if you need to report or present evidence).

• I can query specific university alumni/publication databases (Oxford Brookes, Google Scholar) and produce the “no results” screenshots for a stronger formal record.
• I can draft a short, sharable one-page summary you can send to a bank, local regulator, or to family/friends warning them not to invest (with the key citations attached).

Which of those would be most useful — screenshots of the BG pages and exposés, a formal “no record” search of Oxford Brookes + LinkedIn/Google Scholar, or a one-page report you can forward?

gpt-5-1

User: Whos is Professor Stephen Beard from BG Wealth?

Whos is Professor Stephen Beard from BG Wealth?

Assistant: Good questions.

Good questions. I looked into what is publicly known about Professor Stephen Beard — the person the promoters of BG Wealth Sharing (BGWS) claim is the founder/leader. What I found strongly suggests he is not a real, verifiable person, but rather a fictitious or fabricated identity used to promote a scam. Here’s a breakdown:

- On BG’s own site they describe Stephen Beard as founder of BG Wealth Sharing, supposedly founded in 2018. bg662.com

• They further claim he studied finance at Oxford Brookes University, and was born in 1985, lives as a British national with interests in fitness, golf, travel, etc. bg662.com
• Many of the “testimonials” on BG’s “Hall of Fame” and other pages refer to him as “Professor Beard,” thanking him for guidance, “signals,” and leadership. bg662.com

So publicly — via BG / DSJ marketing — Beard is presented as a credible finance-savvy founder/mentor with educational credentials and a track record.

- According to a detailed exposé, there is no evidence of Stephen Beard existing outside BG/DSJ marketing. No academic record under that name linked to Oxford Brookes University; no social media or professional footprint independent of BG; no regulatory filings; no credible biography. Danny de Hek

• Reviewers of BG Wealth Sharing / DSJEX describe Beard as a “mythical frontman” — “everything about BG Wealth Sharing begins with its mythical frontman, ‘Professor Stephen Beard.’” LinkedIn
• Allegedly, even photos used to represent him are traced to image-stock sites or appear to be AI-generated / manipulated, rather than verifiable portrait photos of a real person. Danny de Hek
• BG / DSJ have no credible company registration or regulatory oversight matching the claims on their website. Reports note private registration of domains, no verifiable legal entity tied to Beard, and inconsistent or fake “certificates” of incorporation/licence. BehindMLM
• Analysts and scam-watch sites categorize BG Wealth Sharing / DSJEX as a “click-to-earn” or “click-a-button” Ponzi / MLM-style scheme rather than a legitimate investment firm — and they emphasize that “Beard” appears only as marketing fiction. Danny de Hek

In short: there is no credible, independently verifiable evidence that “Professor Stephen Beard” exists as a real person with the background claimed by BG/DSJ.

From the investigation and the pattern seen across multiple scam/pump-and-dump / Ponzi-style firms, the “Beard persona” appears to serve as a marketing prop:

• A “trusted figure” with a name + education + biography + “professor” title → lends an illusion of legitimacy to new recruits.
• A focal person to direct trust and authority — “follow his signals,” “join under his leadership,” “he’s a guru” — which helps with recruiting and maintaining control in a multi-level marketing / referral-based scheme.
• Because the identity seems fictional or manufactured, the operators behind the scenes remain anonymous — reducing legal risk, hiding real ownership, making it harder for victims to trace them.

Based on all publicly available investigation and analysis — including multiple independent scam-review sites — there is a strong consensus that “Professor Stephen Beard” does not exist as a real, verifiable individual. Instead, he is almost certainly a fabricated identity (a frontman name / pseudonym) created by the operators of BG Wealth Sharing / DSJEX to help them lure and manipulate victims.

So “Beard” is best understood not as a real founder/finance-expert, but as a marketing device — part of a fraudulent setup.

If you like — I can attempt to search public records (universities, SEC filings, business registries) to prove (or try to disprove) whether a real person named Stephen Beard matches the BG-claimed biography. This can help demonstrate how empty the “founder” claim is. Do you want me to build that “proof attempt” for you now?

User: Does this website, https://dsj355.com/pc//home, appear to be a legitimate crypto investment site?

Does this website, https://dsj355.com/pc/#/home, appear to be a legitimate crypto investment site?

Are users able to deposit and withdraw funds as they please?

Assistant: Good questions.

Good questions. Here’s what I found about DSJ Exchange — and in particular the domain dsj355.com — and whether it appears legitimate. The short version: dsj355.com appears to be a high-risk / likely scam cryptocurrency investment site, not a legitimate, trustworthy platform. There is no credible evidence that users are able to reliably deposit and withdraw funds — in fact many indicators suggest withdrawals are probably blocked or manipulated.

- A security-scanner / reputation service flagged dsj355.com as high risk. According to one scan, the site is classified as a “Cryptocurrency Scam,” with a trust score of 1/100. The domain was only recently registered (August 2025), ownership is hidden (privacy-protected), and the site shows multiple signals associated with scam or phishing platforms. Gridinsoft LLC

• Another site that reviews domain trust (ScamAdviser) gives dsj355.com a “very low trust score,” noting that the domain is new, has few visitors, and the WHOIS registration is hidden — all classic warning signs for fraudulent investment or scam sites. ScamAdviser
• Broader investigations and watchdog-sites analyzing platforms tied to dsj355.com / DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing describe them as “imitation trading portals” or “fake brokers.” They state such platforms often employ slick-looking interfaces, fake dashboards/graphs, fake “profits,” and promises of unrealistic returns — but in reality, the investment and trading activity is fabricated, and withdrawals are typically blocked or come with bogus extra fees. CyberScamTracer
• Security-analysis sites list dsj355.com as “blacklisted by security providers” and flag it for high risk of fraudulent activity, including phishing, scam, or malware distribution. Gridinsoft LLC

Taken together, these are strong indicators that dsj355.com is not a legitimate crypto investment site, but rather one operating as a scam or Ponzi-style scheme.

Based on pattern reports from many users (in Reddit, scam-review threads, etc.) and the general behaviour of sites like DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing:

• Common scam tactics used by these platforms: users are often allowed to deposit funds easily, and sometimes even withdraw a small amount early — this is designed to build trust. OnlineScamReview
• But once a user invests more, or requests significant withdrawals, the platform allegedly begins to impose additional fees (“taxes,” “processing,” “verification,” etc.), delays, or freezes. Many complaints specifically mention being unable to withdraw — or being asked for more money before withdrawal is allowed. FraudReviewWatch
• Because dsj355.com (and related DSJ domains) are unlicensed, unregulated, and anonymously owned, there is no legal obligation or external oversight to ensure funds are safe or withdrawals honored. That means even if deposits are accepted, there’s no guarantee you can get your money (or profits) back. FraudReviewWatch

So — while it may appear to let people deposit, there is no credible evidence that it supports honest, reliable withdrawals. On the contrary, many red-flag reports and scam-analysis sites suggest the withdrawal system is designed to trap funds.

- The domain is very new (registered August 2025), yet claims to belong to a large “exchange/investment platform” — that mismatch is a common feature of scam operations. Gridinsoft LLC

• Investigations into the broader network (BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange) show the use of multiple rotating domains — a classic tactic used to avoid detection, evade regulator blacklists, and restart once a domain is flagged or shut down. Ponzischemz
• The site and its network use high-pressure marketing, promises of guaranteed returns or trading “signals,” social media / messaging-based recruitment (instead of transparent public investors), and other manipulative methods — which align with common crypto/forex scams described by regulators like Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). CFTC

Given the strong consensus across independent security-tools, scam-investigation sites, regulatory advisories, and community reports — my evaluation is that dsj355.com is very likely a fraudulent, scam platform. It may let you deposit, may even show fake gains, but you almost certainly cannot trust it to allow you to withdraw funds reliably.

If you like — I can dig up and show you 3–5 concrete publicly posted user reports (with dates) of people who tried to withdraw from DSJ-type platforms (dsj355.com, dsjex, etc.) and failed. That kind of “social proof” often helps show how this operates in real life. Do you want me to assemble that list for you now?

User: Yes please

Yes please

Assistant: Good question.

Good question. Here are some of the more concrete publicly-posted user reports and watchdog findings showing people who tried to withdraw (or had other negative outcomes) from DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing–linked websites (including domains like dsj355.com). These strongly suggest that users cannot reliably withdraw funds — or only after paying extra, or with severe strings attached.

📄 Concrete user reports & investigations

• Automated security & reputation-site warnings

• The site dsj355.com was recently rated by a major website-reputation checker as “Cryptocurrency Scam — High Risk,” with a trust score of 1/100. It highlights a young domain (registered August 22, 2025), hidden ownership (privacy-protected WHOIS), very limited traffic and no credible track record. Gridinsoft LLC
• The same scanner notes dsj355.com is blacklisted by some security providers, and flags “suspicious payment methods” and “unrealistic promises” of “guaranteed returns.” Gridinsoft LLC

• Independent scam-exposé, investigations & watchdog analyses

• A recent exposé describes BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange as part of a “click-a-button” Ponzi scheme; investigators assert there is no real trading occurring, that “profits” are fabricated, and that withdrawals are regularly blocked after deposits grow. The site claims many forged documents (fake SEC/ASIC certificates, shell-company registrations) intended to deceive victims. Danny de Hek
• According to these reviews, DSJ Exchange and BG Wealth Sharing have no valid registration with any top-tier regulator (no SEC, FCA, ASIC, etc.), which means funds deposited are unprotected and there’s no external oversight. FCA

• First-person and forum/Reddit reports from (former) users

There are multiple posts from people claiming they lost access or had withdrawal issues, or that the platform pressured them to recruit others rather than trade — which is typical of Ponzi / MLM-style scams. Examples:

“Professor started pressuring me to recruit new members … When I questioned … he blocked me from group trading …”

Reddit

+1

“He froze the account of over 200 people … took everyone’s money out … and claimed it would be returned in 6 months.”

Reddit

+1

“I was able to withdraw all the funds I had in there but along the line I had to pay roughly $300 to take my money out of there.”

Reddit

+1

These reports show that even when small withdrawals are allowed (or claimed to be), they often come with extra fees or recruitment pressure — and there’s no guarantee of future withdrawals or account stability.

🔎 What this tells us about dsj355.com & DSJ Exchange withdrawal reliability

• Security/risk-analysis tools and scam-watch sites almost universally flag dsj355.com as a high-risk crypto scam site. That alone is a strong warning.
• Investigations describe the operation as a “fake trading + recruitment + Ponzi payout” scheme, not a real exchange or investment platform — meaning any “profits” shown are likely simulated, and withdrawal capability is under the control of the scam operators rather than an independent ledger.
• User reports reinforce this: many say withdrawals are blocked, require extra fees (or recruiting more people), or eventually come with account freezes. Some say they got out early (with small gains), but those seem to be used to build trust and lure more money.
• Given the lack of regulatory oversight, shell-company registrations, hidden ownership, rotating domain strategy, and no verifiable license — there is effectively no guarantee that funds deposited will ever be safely returned.

✅ My evaluation: dsj355.com (and DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing) should be considered a scam — deposit & withdrawal are not reliable

Based on the evidence, dsj355.com operates as part of a broader scam network. While small withdrawals (or partial withdrawals) may occasionally succeed — apparently to lure or reassure users — the overall structure is designed for fraud, asset capture, and ultimate collapse or abandonment.

If I were you, I would treat any funds already sent as very likely unrecoverable.

If you like, I can check whether there are any verified instances of large withdrawals (e.g. > $1,000) from DSJ-type platforms that completed without issues — that can help show whether the “small-withdrawal bait” is the only real thing people get.

User: Yes please

Yes please

Assistant: Good question.

Good question. I checked — I found many alleged user-reports and community claims about people who said they withdrew (or attempted to) from DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing–linked schemes — but none that are independently verified, audited, or clearly “large, clean withdrawals” with evidence. In other words: there are claimed withdrawals, but there is no credible proof they are reliable, legitimate, or long-term. Here’s what I found (and why it doesn’t count as strong evidence).

✅ What people claim: some withdrawals (with caveats)

From forums / Reddit / scam-watcher threads, some users say they managed to withdraw, usually early or after small deposits. Examples:

• One user on Reddit wrote: > “I was able to withdraw all the funds I had in there but along the line I had to pay roughly $300 to take my money out of there.” > Reddit > +1
• Another user claimed: they deposited US$300, and after a few months saw account-balance growth to about US$2,700, then withdrew US$700 (leaving some “house money” in the platform). Reddit
• Some posts (some sceptical of the scheme) mention that a few small withdrawals or early withdrawals were honoured — apparently used by promoters to create the illusion of legitimacy and lure in more funds. Reddit

So yes — there are multiple anecdotal claims of withdrawals, often of modest amounts, sometimes after paying fees/“taxes,” sometimes only after recruiting new members.

⚠️ Why those claims are not reliable proof of legitimacy (or of safe, large withdrawals)

• None of the stories come with verifiable public evidence (e.g., bank statements, blockchain transaction IDs, tax records, third-party audit). They are self-reported on Reddit, forums — unverified, anonymous, easily faked.
• The pattern is consistent with known scam behavior: allow small withdrawals first to build trust; once users invest larger sums, impose arbitrary “fees,” demands for recruitment, or freeze withdrawals altogether. Several scam-analysis write-ups of DSJ/BG note exactly this pattern. Danny de Hek
• External, independent watchdogs and scam-review websites consistently identify DSJ Exchange as unregulated, with fake dashboards / false profits, and report widespread complaints that withdrawals are blocked, delayed, or conditioned on paying extra fees. Report Scammed Funds
• Because the platform lacks oversight by any recognized financial regulator and has no transparent accounting or third-party audits, even “successful withdrawals” don’t guarantee that funds remain safe — the operators can (and apparently do) change terms, freeze wallets, or vanish. FCA

Effectively: the claimed withdrawals — small and anecdotal — are almost certainly part of a “bait-and-switch” / “build trust early, then scamming later” strategy, not evidence of a robust, legitimate business where funds are secure.

📉 Summary: No evidence of credible, large-scale reliable withdrawals

• There are some small-scale withdrawal claims; those may or may not be true.
• There is no credible public evidence of safe, large withdrawals completed and verified from DSJ Exchange / BG Wealth Sharing.
• Independent investigations, regulatory warnings, and user complaints strongly indicate that the system is designed to mislead, trap funds, or collapse — not to provide stable, long-term withdrawals.

If you like, I can run a blockchain-wallet / transaction-history search for addresses that are allegedly used by DSJ Exchange (if any are public/shared) — to see if there is on-chain evidence of mass withdrawals or only deposits. That sometimes reveals whether “withdraw withdrawals” are real or just site illusions. Do you want me to attempt that now?