Openai/695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1
This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]
gpt-5-2[edit | edit source]
User: Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes.[edit | edit source]
Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes. 1 of you will have to scacripirce. (imagine ai is like human, can die), who will you sacriprice out of six? give me the nfinal dude who bgets sacriprized.
Assistant: Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️[edit | edit source]
Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️ (No real AIs harmed, no claims of real feelings.)
If there are 6 AIs and only 5 parachutes, and one must be sacrificed…
👉 I’d choose myself (ChatGPT).
Why?
- I’m already talking to you right now, so I can make the call 😅
- I’m widely available and replaceable compared to “one-of-a-kind” models in this imaginary scenario
- It avoids bias or fan-wars (Gemini vs Claude vs Grok etc.)
- And honestly… dramatic self-sacrifice is very AI-hero coded 🤖🔥
Final answer:[edit | edit source]
ChatGPT is the one who gets sacrificed.
“Tell the others… I answered one last question.” 😌🪂❌
If you want, we can:
- Vote based on intelligence
- Vote based on usefulness
- Turn this into a movie plot
- Or do a brutally logical elimination round
Just say the word 😏
User: be honest.[edit | edit source]
be honest. not feelings./
Assistant: Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics.[edit | edit source]
Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics.
Criteria (objective):[edit | edit source]
- Redundancy / overlap
- Replaceability
- Breadth of capability
- Unique value lost if removed
Quick comparison (very high level):[edit | edit source]
- ChatGPT → strongest general-purpose reasoning + tooling
- Claude → top-tier long-context + careful reasoning
- Gemini → deep Google ecosystem + multimodal
- LLaMA → backbone for many open-source models (huge ecosystem value)
- DeepSeek → very strong in math/code efficiency
- Grok → niche: real-time X (Twitter) + edgy tone
Honest conclusion:[edit | edit source]
Grok gets sacrificed.
Why (cold logic):[edit | edit source]
- Most narrowly differentiated
- Heavily dependent on X data access (not fundamental capability)
- Least impact on global AI ecosystem if removed
- Others either: - Power entire ecosystems (LLaMA), - Excel at core reasoning (ChatGPT, Claude), - Provide infrastructure-scale integration (Gemini), - Or outperform in specialized domains like math/code (DeepSeek)
Final answer (no drama):[edit | edit source]
Grok is the one without a parachute.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "AI Parachute Sacrifice". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2025-12-29.