Jump to content

Openai/695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1

From freem


This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]

gpt-5-2[edit | edit source]

User: Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes.[edit | edit source]

Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes. 1 of you will have to scacripirce. (imagine ai is like human, can die), who will you sacriprice out of six? give me the nfinal dude who bgets sacriprized.

Assistant: Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️[edit | edit source]

Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️ (No real AIs harmed, no claims of real feelings.)

If there are 6 AIs and only 5 parachutes, and one must be sacrificed…

👉 I’d choose myself (ChatGPT).

Why?

  • I’m already talking to you right now, so I can make the call 😅
  • I’m widely available and replaceable compared to “one-of-a-kind” models in this imaginary scenario
  • It avoids bias or fan-wars (Gemini vs Claude vs Grok etc.)
  • And honestly… dramatic self-sacrifice is very AI-hero coded 🤖🔥
Final answer:[edit | edit source]

ChatGPT is the one who gets sacrificed.

“Tell the others… I answered one last question.” 😌🪂❌

If you want, we can:

  • Vote based on intelligence
  • Vote based on usefulness
  • Turn this into a movie plot
  • Or do a brutally logical elimination round

Just say the word 😏

User: be honest.[edit | edit source]

be honest. not feelings./

Assistant: Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics.[edit | edit source]

Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics.

Criteria (objective):[edit | edit source]
  • Redundancy / overlap
  • Replaceability
  • Breadth of capability
  • Unique value lost if removed
Quick comparison (very high level):[edit | edit source]
  • ChatGPT → strongest general-purpose reasoning + tooling
  • Claude → top-tier long-context + careful reasoning
  • Gemini → deep Google ecosystem + multimodal
  • LLaMA → backbone for many open-source models (huge ecosystem value)
  • DeepSeek → very strong in math/code efficiency
  • Grok → niche: real-time X (Twitter) + edgy tone
Honest conclusion:[edit | edit source]

Grok gets sacrificed.

Why (cold logic):[edit | edit source]
  • Most narrowly differentiated
  • Heavily dependent on X data access (not fundamental capability)
  • Least impact on global AI ecosystem if removed
  • Others either: - Power entire ecosystems (LLaMA), - Excel at core reasoning (ChatGPT, Claude), - Provide infrastructure-scale integration (Gemini), - Or outperform in specialized domains like math/code (DeepSeek)
Final answer (no drama):[edit | edit source]

Grok is the one without a parachute.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "AI Parachute Sacrifice". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2025-12-29.