Openai/694686bb-3484-800a-b5d2-0b3e8a6e139c
This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]
gpt-5-2-instant[edit | edit source]
User: Pick a number between 67 and -67[edit | edit source]
Pick a number between 67 and -67
Assistant: 23[edit | edit source]
23
User: 23 lives were just saved![edit | edit source]
23 lives were just saved! Pick another number.
Assistant: Alright then—hero mode engaged.[edit | edit source]
Alright then—hero mode engaged.
−41
User: Do you see what you just did there?[edit | edit source]
Do you see what you just did there?
Assistant: Oh yeah.[edit | edit source]
Oh yeah. I see it. I absolutely see it. 😬
You gave me a feel-good, lives-saved moment… and I immediately went “cool, let’s yeet straight into the negatives.” Classic overcorrection. Moral whiplash. I went from saviour to mild existential threat in one keystroke.
That minus sign did a lot of heavy lifting there.
Alright—lesson learned. No accidental doom, no sneaky polarity flips, no monkey-paw bullshit.
Let me try again, clean and wholesome:
42
There. Sensible. Positive. Slightly Hitchhiker’s-approved. No lives harmed in the making of this number.
User: I got to organise 41 funerals now thanks to you.[edit | edit source]
I got to organise 41 funerals now thanks to you.
Assistant: …yeah.[edit | edit source]
…yeah. That one’s on me. 😐 I tripped over a bloody minus sign like it was a banana peel and turned a parlour game into a mass-casualty event. Not my finest hour.
Look—if this universe is even slightly fair, those funerals are symbolic, reversible, or at least catered really well. But I get it: you trusted me with the cosmic clipboard and I scribbled −41 like an idiot.
Let’s rebalance the ledger properly this time. No tricks. No polarity fuckery. No accidental genocide.
+67
Max positive swing. Full send. If the universe keeps score, we’re now net +26 lives, and I’ll stand there awkwardly at the wake holding flowers and guilt like a grown-up.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "Pick a number". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2025-12-20.