Openai/6925e966-26bc-8001-b158-075014259e86
This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]
gpt-5-1 edit
User: whats a recoverable strict and cascadeless schedules, how is the venn diagram and what is the diff edit
whats a recoverable strict and cascadeless schedules, how is the venn diagram and what is the diff
Assistant: Here’s the clearest, exam-perfect explanation of Recoverable, Cascadeless, and Strict schedules — with an intuitive Ven… edit
Here’s the clearest, exam-perfect explanation of Recoverable, Cascadeless, and Strict schedules — with an intuitive Venn diagram relationship and differences.
✅ 1. Recoverable Schedules edit
A schedule is recoverable if:
👉 A transaction commits only after every transaction whose data it read has committed.
Formally: If Tj reads Xi from Ti, then Tj must commit after Ti commits.
Example edit
T1: W(A) … T2: R(A) (reads from T1) … If T2 commits after T1 → Recoverable
If T2 commits before T1 → NOT recoverable (if T1 aborts, T2 used dirty data)
Purpose edit
- Prevents a committed transaction from depending on an uncommitted one.
- Avoids unrecoverable schedules.
✅ 2. Cascadeless (Avoids Cascading Aborts) Schedules edit
A schedule is cascadeless if:
👉 A transaction reads only committed values. Meaning: no transaction reads data written by another uncommitted transaction.
Example edit
T1: W(A) T2: R(A) For cascadelss: T2 can read only after T1 commits.
Why? edit
- If T1 aborts, no one else has read dirty data, so no need to abort T2.
- No “chain reaction” aborts.
Relationship edit
All cascadelss schedules are recoverable, but not all recoverable are cascadelss.
✅ 3. Strict Schedules edit
A schedule is strict if:
👉 No transaction can read or write a data item until the last writer commits or aborts.
This means:
- If Ti writes A, no other transaction can read A until Ti commits/aborts.
- If Ti writes A, no other transaction can write A until Ti commits/aborts.
Strict = No dirty reads + No dirty writes edit
It gives the strongest form of isolation.
Benefit edit
- Easy to recover from crashes because you can simply undo last writer.
- Most practical DBMS implement strict schedules (via strict 2PL).
🎯 Venn Diagram Relationship edit
STRICT
________
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ CASCADELESS \
/ _______ \
/ / \ \
/_____/ RECOVERABLE \______In words: edit
✔ Strict ⊆ Cascadeless ⊆ Recoverable
- Every strict schedule is also cascadeless
- Every cascadeless is also recoverable
- But the reverse is not true
📌 Differences Table (Exam-Ready) edit
| Property | Recoverable | Cascadeless | Strict | | ------------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Reads from uncommitted data | Allowed | ❌ Not allowed | ❌ Not allowed | | Writes to data written by uncommitted | Allowed | Allowed | ❌ Not allowed | | Avoids cascading aborts | ❌ No | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes | | Simplest to recover | ❌ No | Partial | ✔ Best | | Is strongest? | No | Medium | ✔ Strongest |
⭐ Quick Memory Trick edit
- Recoverable → commit order safe
- Cascadeless → read only committed data
- Strict → read/write only after commit
If you want, I can give examples, non-examples, or a MCQ set to practice!
References edit
- ↑ "Recoverable strict cascadeless schedules". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2025-11-25.