Jump to content

Openai/696e6a01-774c-800e-ba09-27789cd71a9f

From freem
Revision as of 05:30, 20 January 2026 by Lukegao (talk | contribs) (by freem.ai...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


This conversation was exported from ChatGPT[1]

gpt-5-2[edit | edit source]

User: Az „<tabTitleNick Schifrin @nickschifrin: "NEW: @potus letter to @jonasgahrstore links @NobelPrize to Greenland, reiter…[edit | edit source]

A(z) „<tabTitle>Nick Schifrin (@nickschifrin): "NEW: @potus letter to @jonasgahrstore links @NobelPrize to Greenland, reiterates threats, and is forwarded by the NSC staff to multiple European ambassadors in Washington. I obtained the text from multiple officials: Dear Ambassador: President Trump has asked that the following message, shared with Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, be forwarded to your [named head of government/state] “Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”" | XCancel</tabTitle>” oldalon vagyok, és ez van kiválasztva: „<selection>“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a “right of ownership” anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”</selection>”. Lektorálja a kijelölést helyesírási és nyelvtani hibák szempontjából. Azonosítsa a hibákat, és adja vissza a szöveg javított változatát. Tartsa meg a jelentést és a tényszerű információkat, és először írja ki a javasolt javításokat, majd azt kövesse a szöveg javított változata.

Assistant: Az alábbiakban a kijelölt angol szöveg helyesírási, nyelvtani és stilisztikai hibáit azonosítom, majd megadom a javítot…[edit | edit source]

Az alábbiakban a kijelölt angol szöveg helyesírási, nyelvtani és stilisztikai hibáit azonosítom, majd megadom a javított változatot. A jelentést és a tényszerű állításokat változatlanul hagyom.

Javasolt javítások és indoklásuk[edit | edit source]

  1. „your Country” → „your country” Az angolban a country köznév, kisbetűvel írandó.
  2. „for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS” → „for having stopped eight wars, plus” - Számok esetén folyó szövegben ajánlott a betűvel írt forma. - A wars nem tulajdonnév, kisbetűs. - A PLUS indokolatlanul nagybetűs.
  3. „Peace” → „peace” Nem tulajdonnév, ezért kisbetűs.
  4. „why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?” → „why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?” Nyelvtanilag helyes, de stilisztikailag pontosabbá tehető lenne; azonban minimális beavatkozás elvét követve változatlan marad.
  5. „There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago” → mondattörés Ez egy comma splice (vesszővel összekapcsolt két teljes mondat). Javítás: mondatfelosztás vagy kötőszó használata.
  6. „but we had boats landing there, also.” → „but we had boats landing there as well.” Az also mondatvégi használata kerülendő; az as well természetesebb.
  7. „since its founding” → stilisztikailag helyes, de a mondat egészében túl hosszú; enyhe tagolás javasolt.
  8. „The World” → „The world” Nem tulajdonnév, kisbetűs.
  9. „Complete and Total Control” → „complete and total control” Indokolatlan nagybetűzés.
  10. Konzisztencia és olvashatóság javítása Hosszú mondatok enyhe tagolása, anélkül hogy a hangnem vagy a tartalom változna.

Javított szöveg[edit | edit source]

“Dear Jonas: Considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped eight wars, plus, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of peace, although it will always be predominant. I can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents; it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there as well. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now NATO should do something for the United States. The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”

Ha szeretné, készíthetek stilárisan semlegesebb, formálisabb, vagy éppen retorikailag erősebb, de továbbra is hű változatot is.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "Szöveg lektorálás". ChatGPT. Retrieved 2026-01-20.