Openai/68503d6e-9400-800b-a15a-dd25d536e24f

This conversation was exported from ChatGPT

gpt-4o

User: oncor is proposing a power line called bell county east that will be passing in an around Briggs, texas, where can I ge…

oncor is proposing a power line called bell county east that will be passing in an around Briggs, texas, where can I get a map of this?

Assistant: You can find detailed route maps for Oncor’s Bell County East – Big Hill 765 kV transmission line which includes the “B…

You can find detailed route maps for Oncor’s Bell County East – Big Hill 765 kV transmission line (which includes the “Bell County East” project in the Briggs, TX area) directly from Oncor’s website. Here's how to access them:

- Oncor’s official Current Transmission Line Projects page lists the Bell County East – Big Hill 765 kV Transmission Line Project, including a downloadable Project Map for the approved route felt.com.

Scroll to find the project section—it includes a labeled “Project Map” (often called Figure 1* or similar), which outlines the exact path through Bell County.

- Oncor submitted this line to the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) under Docket No. 58126 on May 29, 2025 oncor.com.

• The PUCT’s Public Interchange for that docket contains both the detailed route and any supplemental maps. You can search their docket system for “58126” to view/download PDFs.

- Bell County’s Engineering Department offers GIS and ARC‑GIS files (contact Gary Stermer, 254‑933‑5275 or [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])) interchange.puc.texas.govbellcountytx.com.

• They may have interactive overlays showing the proposed transmission line path through the county, including around Briggs.

1. Visit Oncor’s Current Transmission Projects page and download the Bell County East – Big Hill route map.

1. Search PUCT Docket 58126 for official filing and route details.
2. Consider contacting Bell County’s engineering office for GIS‑based overlays.

- Oncor’s site: Has a downloadable project map for the Bell County East transmission line interchange.puc.texas.govercot.com.

• PUCT Docket 58126: Includes all technical filings and maps.
• Bell County GIS office: Can provide local map overlays.

Let me know if you'd like help navigating the PUCT docket or interpreting the map in relation to Briggs!

User: how do we stop it?

how do we stop it?

Assistant: To oppose Oncor’s Bell County East transmission line currently under PUCT Docket 58126, here’s what you can do:

To oppose Oncor’s Bell County East transmission line (currently under PUCT Docket 58126), here’s what you can do:

Any landowner or resident can intervene to become a party in the case. This gives you the right to:

• File motions and testimony
• Participate in technical hearings
• Appeal lines/routes

The PUCT encourages public participation—if enough parties intervene, the case may be referred to the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) for a trial-like process felt.com.

Steps:

1. Visit the TX PUC Interchange.
2. Search for Control Number 58126.
3. Follow the instructions to submit a request to intervene—typically before the deadline noted in the PUCT's preliminary order.

Oncor is required to hold public meetings along the proposed route. They include maps and gathering feedback. Find:

• Dates/locations on Oncor’s site or local newspapers
• PDF meeting materials and maps (e.g., “Figure 1”)
• A window to submit written comments supporting or opposing the line

Engaging early—before the PUCT approves the route—is crucial interchange.puc.texas.gov.

Navigating a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) process is complex. Support from:

• Architectural/legal experts: to help file party statements, cross-examine expert witnesses, and propose alternate routes
• Engineering consultants: to challenge technical data, impacts, or propose lower-impact alternatives

Even public brochures recommend professional representation during hearings ercot.com.

- Engage neighbors and landowners along the proposed path to file joint interventions and comments.

• Coordinate with local officials, county commissioners, township representatives.
• Public pressure—including petitions, local coverage, or attendance—can influence the PUCT.

| | | |

| --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

1. Visit PUCT Interchange, search for Docket 58126 → request to intervene.

1. Check Oncor’s site and local media for public meeting notices.
2. Write a comment including your personal impacts (property values, environmental, health, etc.).
3. Contact legal/technical consultants with experience in CCN proceedings.

Want help drafting a comment or pinpointing upcoming hearing dates? I can help you access the PUCT docket and walk through deadlines.

User: how do i file to intervene?

how do i file to intervene?

Assistant: To formally intervene in PUCT Docket No.

To formally intervene in PUCT Docket No. 58126 (Oncor’s Bell County East — Big Hill transmission line), follow these clear steps:

You must file a written statement of interest, including:

• Your name, address, email, and phone number
• The PUCT docket number: 58126
• A description of how you’re directly affected — e.g., your land is crossed by or near the proposed line, risks to property, health, or county resources en.wikipedia.orgcpsenergy.com.

You can use:

• The official PUCT Intervention form (CCN Request to Intervene) cityofjustin.com
• Or a free-form letter containing all the required elements

There are two filing options:

a. E‑file via PUCT’s “PUC Filer”:

1. Register or log into the PUC Filer on the PUCT website.
2. Submit your “Request to Intervene” under Docket 58126.
3. Obtain your tracking number after submission.
4. Serve copies to all parties in the docket (e.g., Oncor, PUCT Staff).
5. Email your Tracking Sheet and the filing to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) interchange.puc.texas.govinterchange.puc.texas.gov

b. File by mail:

• Mail 10 copies to: `` Public Utility Commission of Texas Central Records – Filing Clerk 1701 N. Congress Ave. P.O. Box 13326 Austin, TX 78711‑3326 ``
• Or use courier delivery to the physical address at 1701 N. Congress Ave., Austin, 78701 cityofjustin.comcenterpointenergy.com

Once accepted as an Intervenor, you'll have the following rights:

• Access to all filed documents and evidence
• Submit affidavits/testimony
• Participate in hearings and cross-examine witnesses
• File motions, discovery requests, and briefs ftp.puc.texas.gov

You'll also be expected to serve all filings on other parties and comply with PUCT procedural rules ftp.puc.texas.gov.

| | |

| --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Let me know if you’d like assistance with:

• Drafting your intervention statement
• Setting up the PUC Filer account
• Serving other parties or tracking the docket

You're taking a strong step—becoming a party is the best way to ensure your concerns about Briggs and your property are heard.

User: if I intervene do I lose any rights?

if I intervene do I lose any rights?

Assistant: No — you do not lose any rights by intervening in a Public Utility Commission of Texas PUCT case like Docket No.

No — you do not lose any rights by intervening in a Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) case like Docket No. 58126. In fact, you gain rights that non-participants do not have.

Here’s a breakdown:

As an intervenor, you are a formal party to the case, which gives you:

• The right to receive all filings in the case
• The right to submit testimony or evidence
• The right to cross-examine Oncor’s witnesses
• The right to propose alternative routes
• The right to appeal a final decision

Without intervening, you can only submit a public comment — which does not obligate the Commission to consider your specific concerns or give you any further input.

Generally, no legal rights are forfeited by intervening. However:

| | | | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | |

If you don’t intervene:

• You can still submit a public comment, but you won’t have any role in route selection or hearings.
• You can’t appeal the decision or ask for route changes.
• Your concerns are not part of the evidentiary record the Commission must consider.

:

If you’d like, I can help you draft a simple intervention request to minimize time and stress.

User: The power company has its eyes on clearing the oak trees and land on 22% of my property and run a high tension power l…

The power company has its eyes on clearing the oak trees and land on 22% of my property and run a high tension power line within 150' of my house. Are they required to compensate me for this? What are my avenues to stop this and separately be compensated for this involuntary seizure of my land?

Assistant: Yes, Oncor is legally required to compensate you if any portion of your land is taken, cleared, or burdened by an easem…

Yes, Oncor is legally required to compensate you if any portion of your land is taken, cleared, or burdened by an easement for the high-voltage transmission line. This is done through eminent domain, but only after the project is approved by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT).

Here’s a breakdown of your rights, compensation, and action steps:

Yes. If the line is built across or near your property, Oncor must:

• Negotiate with you for a transmission line easement, or
• If you refuse, initiate an eminent domain lawsuit to forcibly acquire it

In both cases, you are entitled to:

• Fair market value for the land or easement taken
• Damages for loss in value to the rest of your property, especially if the line is within sight of your home
• Tree and vegetation loss compensation
• Potential loss-of-use damages (e.g., access, enjoyment, fencing)

Texas law protects landowners’ rights under Tex. Prop. Code §§ 21.001 et seq. (the eminent domain statutes).

You can attempt to:

- File to intervene in Docket No. 58126 (urgently) — this is your only chance to influence the route.

• Argue that the selected path has unreasonable impact on: - Proximity to your residence (150′ is very close) - Heritage trees (oaks), vegetation, environmental concerns - Safety, health, property value, aesthetics

If enough evidence and opposition are presented, the PUCT may:

• Modify the route
• Choose an alternate route proposed by Oncor
• Require more mitigation

- Challenge the amount of compensation

• Raise land use violations, or
• Seek injunctive relief in very rare cases (e.g., fraud, improper notice, constitutional takings)

If Oncor proceeds:

1. They’ll offer a purchase price or easement payment
2. You can negotiate, or
3. If you decline, they will file a condemnation lawsuit - This triggers a Special Commissioners Hearing under Texas law - You can present your valuation, hire appraisers, attorneys, etc. - If unsatisfied, you can appeal to a jury trial

Landowners often receive higher compensation through challenge than initially offered.

| | |

| --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

- You cannot be forced to accept a price — only a judge or jury can impose value

• You are owed “just compensation” under the Texas and U.S. Constitutions
• You can be compensated for both actual land taken and diminution to the remainder
• The PUCT cannot determine compensation — only route approval; compensation is later

Once the PUCT approves the route, your chance to alter its path is essentially over. Your best leverage is right now—before approval.

Would you like help drafting a formal intervention statement tailored to these facts (22% land impact, 150′ proximity, oak clearing)? I can also help outline the expected stages of the eminent domain process with key dates.

User: yes,

yes,

Assistant: Great — here's a draft intervention statement tailored to your situation that you can file with the Public Utility Comm…

Great — here's a draft intervention statement tailored to your situation that you can file with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) in Docket No. 58126 to formally intervene and preserve your rights to challenge the Bell County East – Big Hill transmission line route:

:

Request to Intervene

My name is [Your Full Legal Name]. I am a landowner directly affected by one or more of the proposed routes for the above-referenced transmission line project.

I request to intervene in this proceeding under 16 Texas Administrative Code § 22.103.

I own property located at [Your Property Address or Description of Property Location], which will be adversely affected by the proposed transmission line. Approximately 22% of my land may be impacted, and the proposed high-voltage line may run within 150 feet of my residence. The project would require clearing mature oak trees and materially impair the value, usability, aesthetics, and enjoyment of my property.

Because this project directly threatens my property, I have a justiciable interest that may be adversely affected by the outcome of this proceeding.

I request that all communications and filings be sent to me at:

Respectfully submitted, [Your Signature (if printed)] [Your Typed Name]

Option 1: E-File via PUCT Interchange

1. Go to: https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/
2. Register for a PUC Filer account if you haven’t already.
3. File under Docket No. 58126
4. Attach your Request to Intervene as a PDF or Word doc.
5. Serve a copy to all other parties (including Oncor’s attorneys).
6. Email a copy with the e-filing tracking sheet to [email protected]

Option 2: Mail (if not e-filing)

• Print 10 copies of the request.
• Mail to:

Public Utility Commission of Texas  
Attn: Central Records – Filing Clerk  
1701 N. Congress Ave.  
P.O. Box 13326  
Austin, TX 78711-3326

Would you like me to generate a fillable PDF version of this form or email template version for sending to the PUC? I can also help draft follow-up statements or public comments to support rerouting the line away from your home.

User: how do I serve a copy to all other parties?

how do I serve a copy to all other parties?

Assistant: To serve your Request to Intervene on all other parties in PUCT Docket No.

To serve your Request to Intervene on all other parties in PUCT Docket No. 58126, you must send a copy of your filing to each party listed in the official service list. Here's how to do that step-by-step:

###

• Go to the PUCT Interchange website: 🔗 https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/
• Search for Docket No. 58126
• Click on a recent filing (e.g., a "notice," “order,” or “party filing”)
• Find the Service List or "Parties" tab – this will list: - Name of each party - Attorney or representative name - Mailing address - Email address (if available)

🔹 Tip: You can also call PUCT Central Records (512-936-7180) to ask for the current service list.

After you’ve completed your Request to Intervene (PDF or Word doc), you'll:

• Attach the document to an email (PDF is best)
• Write a short message, e.g.:

- Email it to each party’s listed email address

• If a party does not list an email, mail a physical copy via certified mail (recommended for proof)

Example email recipients might include:

• Oncor’s legal counsel (e.g., Hunt Guillot & Associates, or Vinson & Elkins)
• PUCT Legal Division (PUC staff attorneys)
• Intervenors (if others have already filed)

User: how far is considered a safe distance to live from a high tension power line?

how far is considered a safe distance to live from a high tension power line?

Assistant: There is no universally mandated "safe distance" from high-tension power lines, but several benchmarks are commonly ref…

There is no universally mandated "safe distance" from high-tension power lines, but several benchmarks are commonly referenced based on health, electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, fire risk, and noise/vibration. The key factors are:

- High-voltage transmission lines (typically 345 kV to 765 kV, like Oncor's Bell County East line) emit low-frequency electromagnetic fields.

• Most health agencies (e.g., WHO, CDC) do not confirm causality between EMF exposure and cancer, but they acknowledge a potential association with childhood leukemia at chronic exposure above 0.3–0.4 µT (3–4 mG).

| | |

| --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | |

➤ At 150 feet, you could still be exposed to 10–20 mG, which is higher than ambient levels.

🧠 Interpretation: While not legally unsafe, many researchers and health-conscious planners recommend a minimum of 300–500 feet from major transmission lines for long-term residential exposure, especially for families with young children.

- Fire danger zones are a concern in dry areas like Central Texas.

• Power lines can arc in storms or extreme conditions; safe design typically assumes a minimum of 100–150 ft right-of-way, but actual danger in catastrophic failure could extend well beyond that.
• Falling conductors or structural collapse (rare but possible in extreme weather) can reach 200+ ft depending on span and tower height.

- Audible corona noise and visual impact can extend up to 500 feet.

• Property values are often reduced 10%–30% for homes within 200 feet of a 345+ kV line.
• A line within 150 feet of your home is well within the impact zone for marketability and use concerns.

While not binding, many U.S. planning agencies and developers:

• Avoid building homes within 200–500 feet of transmission lines over 230 kV
• Require right-of-way clearances of 150+ feet for 345–765 kV lines
• Use 300–400 feet as a conservative buffer in new development designs

| | |

| --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | |

You are within the range of impact for:

• Elevated EMF exposure
• Audible/visual nuisance
• Significant property devaluation
• Possible safety concerns

This fact strengthens your PUCT intervention and may support a takings claim or higher compensation if the line proceeds.

Would you like help drafting a section for your intervention that explains why 150 feet is unacceptably close based on EMF, safety, and marketability evidence?

User: what does a 765KV tower look like?

what does a 765KV tower look like?

Assistant: !https://tractebel\-engie\.be/files/attachments/\.656/wl1200hp1200q85\765kV\Tower\02\.jpghttps://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id…

!https://tractebel\-engie\.be/files/attachments/\.656/wl1200hp1200q85\_765kV\_Tower\_02\.jpg !https://www\.megatro\.cn/data/thumb/res/en/20190808/89f253a4f318916b\.jpg\_20190808145653\_570x760\.jpeg !https://i\.pinimg\.com/originals/92/d0/a1/92d0a1d1e85a24a3c4027da8b283f72c\.jpg !https://www\.megatro\.cn/data/thumb/res/en/20190808/a0ab58519579ab2f\.jpg\_20190808145431\_570x760\.jpg

Here's what a 765 kV transmission tower typically looks like:

- Steel lattice tower — a robust, crisscross-steel framework designed to handle immense weight, wind, and ice loads towerproduct.en.made-in-china.com.

• Usually a self-supporting structure (no need for guy wires), though some variations (like V-shaped guyed towers) do use supporting cables en.wikipedia.org.

- Tower height typically ranges from 135–150 feet in flat terrain, and up to 200 feet or more in hilly or special-span areas web.ecs.baylor.edu.

• On VERY tall spans (e.g. long river crossings), units can reach heights of 300+ feet (~95 m) en.wikipedia.org.

- Carries one or two circuits, each with three phase conductors, often bundled in doubles or triples per phase to reduce corona and energy loss towerproduct.en.made-in-china.com.

• You’ll see distinct cross-arms extending from the tower’s top to support these conductors — either stacked vertically or arranged horizontally en.wikipedia.org.

- Towers are much taller and wider than standard distribution poles due to: - Increased insulation needs - Larger right‑of‑way clearances (≈200 ft for 765 kV) en.wikipedia.orgindigrid.co.inmegatro.cn

• These structures dominate the landscape—highly visible from hundreds of feet away.

| | |

| --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Expect a massive steel tower, reaching 150–200 ft tall, with broad arms supporting thick electrical cables. It’s a permanent, imposing presence on the land.

Let me know if you'd like more technical details, like insulator types, ground wire placement, or how spans impact your property's clearance.

User: what is the source used by planning and zoning norms for lines over 230KV?

what is the source used by planning and zoning norms for lines over 230KV?

Assistant: Planning and zoning norms for high-voltage transmission lines especially those over 230 kV generally draw on a combinat…

Planning and zoning norms for high-voltage transmission lines (especially those over 230 kV) generally draw on a combination of state utility commission standards, industry engineering guidelines, federal environmental and energy agency guidance, and case law precedent. However, there is no single uniform source. Here's a structured overview of the most widely used and cited authorities:

📘 Primary Sources for Planning & Zoning Setbacks over 230 kV

1. NESC (National Electrical Safety Code)

• Published by the IEEE, this sets minimum clearance and safety distances for power lines and structures.
• Defines vertical and horizontal clearance from the ground, buildings, and other structures for different voltages.
• Not zoning law, but adopted by many states and used to establish technical baselines.

🧩 Example: NESC Rule 232 defines minimum clearance of 23–30 feet from conductors to ground depending on voltage and environment.

2. ANSI / IEEE Guidelines

• IEEE 738, 1243, 656 and other standards cover thermal, structural, and EMF field evaluations for transmission line design.
• Used by utility engineers and often incorporated into utility easement or right-of-way design documents.

3. State-Level PUC Siting Guidelines

• For example: - Texas: PUCT uses a routing process (16 Tex. Admin. Code §25.101) requiring evaluation of proximity to residences, habitable structures, and environmentally sensitive areas, but does not impose specific setbacks. - Other states like California, Minnesota, and Virginia issue routing handbooks or recommend setback buffers (e.g., 300 ft+ for 500 kV lines).

4. U.S. EPA & WHO Guidance on EMF

• The EPA and World Health Organization (WHO) have issued summaries of EMF research. While they stop short of setting mandatory buffers, some local zoning authorities adopt these to justify 300–500 ft setbacks.

5. County/Local Zoning Codes

• Most actual setback rules come from local ordinances, informed by the above.
• Example: Some counties prohibit siting >230 kV lines within 300 feet of homes or schools unless special conditions are met.
• These vary widely and often defer to public comment, land use compatibility studies, or environmental impact assessments (EIAs).

6. Case Law & Legal Precedent

• Texas courts have upheld that visual blight, EMF concern, and marketability justify compensation or restrictions.
• These cases indirectly guide local planners and attorneys in recommending larger setbacks for major lines.

🔍 Sample Local Zoning Practices (Non-Binding but Common)

| Voltage | Typical ROW Width | Common Informal Setback (homes) | | ---------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------- | | 230 kV | 100–150 ft | 150–300 ft | | 345 kV | 150–200 ft | 300–500 ft | | 500–765 kV | 200–250 ft | 500+ ft |

These are often cited in local planning board documents, conditional use permits, and county transmission siting policies.

✅ Takeaway

There’s no single national zoning law setting a fixed distance, but planners rely heavily on:

• NESC and IEEE safety and clearance codes
• PUC environmental criteria and routing standards
• EPA/WHO EMF summaries
• Local zoning precedent and community standards

If you're pushing for greater setbacks in your PUCT intervention, citing these sources (especially PUCT Rule §25.101, NESC Rule 232, and local zoning analogs) will make your case more persuasive.

Would you like a one-page summary PDF of these authorities to include in a formal filing or community presentation?