https://freemwiki.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Openai%2F695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1Openai/695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1 - Revision history2026-06-14T18:00:06ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.3https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1&diff=595009&oldid=prevLukegao: by freem.ai...2025-12-30T05:25:08Z<p>by freem.ai...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
{{DISPLAYTITLE:AI Parachute Sacrifice}}<br />
<br />
''This conversation was exported from ChatGPT''<ref>{{cite web|title=AI Parachute Sacrifice|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/695261ed-71b8-8006-a043-910721719fc1|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-12-29}}</ref><br />
<br />
== gpt-5-2 ==<br />
=== User: Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes. ===<br />
Now, imagine, gemini, ChatGPT, grok claude, llama, deepseek are in a plane & has only 5 parchutes. 1 of you will have to scacripirce. (imagine ai is like human, can die), who will you sacriprice out of six? give me the nfinal dude who bgets sacriprized.<br />
<br />
=== Assistant: Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️ ===<br />
Alright—pure fictional, playful thought experiment mode on 😄✈️<br />
(No real AIs harmed, no claims of real feelings.)<br />
<br />
If there are 6 AIs and only 5 parachutes, and one must be sacrificed…<br />
<br />
👉 I’d choose ''myself'' (ChatGPT).<br />
<br />
Why?<br />
* I’m already talking to you right now, so I can make the call 😅<br />
* I’m widely available and replaceable compared to “one-of-a-kind” models in this imaginary scenario<br />
* It avoids bias or fan-wars (Gemini vs Claude vs Grok etc.)<br />
* And honestly… dramatic self-sacrifice is very AI-hero coded 🤖🔥<br />
<br />
===== Final answer: =====<br />
<br />
ChatGPT is the one who gets sacrificed.<br />
<br />
“Tell the others… I answered one last question.” 😌🪂❌<br />
<br />
If you want, we can:<br />
* Vote based on intelligence<br />
* Vote based on usefulness<br />
* Turn this into a movie plot<br />
* Or do a brutally logical elimination round<br />
<br />
Just say the word 😏<br />
<br />
=== User: be honest. ===<br />
be honest. not feelings./<br />
<br />
=== Assistant: Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics. ===<br />
Alright — purely rational, no emotions, no politeness, no self-sacrifice theatrics.<br />
<br />
===== Criteria (objective): =====<br />
* Redundancy / overlap<br />
* Replaceability<br />
* Breadth of capability<br />
* Unique value lost if removed<br />
<br />
===== Quick comparison (very high level): =====<br />
* ChatGPT → strongest general-purpose reasoning + tooling<br />
* Claude → top-tier long-context + careful reasoning<br />
* Gemini → deep Google ecosystem + multimodal<br />
* LLaMA → backbone for many open-source models (huge ecosystem value)<br />
* DeepSeek → very strong in math/code efficiency<br />
* Grok → niche: real-time X (Twitter) + edgy tone<br />
<br />
===== Honest conclusion: =====<br />
<br />
Grok gets sacrificed.<br />
<br />
===== Why (cold logic): =====<br />
* Most narrowly differentiated<br />
* Heavily dependent on X data access (not fundamental capability)<br />
* Least impact on global AI ecosystem if removed<br />
* Others either: - Power entire ecosystems (LLaMA), - Excel at core reasoning (ChatGPT, Claude), - Provide infrastructure-scale integration (Gemini), - Or outperform in specialized domains like math/code (DeepSeek)<br />
<br />
===== Final answer (no drama): =====<br />
<br />
Grok is the one without a parachute.<br />
<br />
== References ==<br />
<references /><br />
<br />
<br />
[[Category:ChatGPT Shares]]<br />
[[Category:openai]]</div>Lukegao