<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://freemwiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Openai%2F694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a</id>
	<title>Openai/694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Openai%2F694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T22:41:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a&amp;diff=594905&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Lukegao: by freem.ai...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a&amp;diff=594905&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-12-27T05:24:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by freem.ai...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DISPLAYTITLE:H1B Salary Impact Analysis}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;This conversation was exported from ChatGPT&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|title=H1B Salary Impact Analysis|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/694ec3f1-2e78-800f-acdf-d2d7a59cba6a|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-12-27}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== gpt-5-2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== User: Most H1Bs are L1 or other visa trying to transfer not people from outside so the 100k won’t have big impact.- is this s… ===&lt;br /&gt;
Most H1Bs are L1 or other visa trying to transfer not people from outside so the 100k won’t have big impact.- is this statement true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Assistant: The statement is largely incorrect or at best misleading. ===&lt;br /&gt;
The statement is largely incorrect or at best misleading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why:&lt;br /&gt;
# Most H-1B approvals are not transfers from L-1 or other visas. - While a significant share of H-1B filings are change-of-status or transfers (including L-1, F-1 OPT, H-4, etc.), a very large portion still represents new labor market entrants—especially: - F-1 students moving to H-1B (cap-subject) - Workers abroad hired directly by U.S. employers - USCIS data consistently shows cap-subject H-1Bs (the 65k + 20k) are heavily used for new hires, not just internal transfers.&lt;br /&gt;
# L-1 → H-1B is not the dominant pathway. - L-1 workers are a minority of H-1B applicants. - The largest feeder category is actually F-1 OPT students, not L-1s.&lt;br /&gt;
# A $100k minimum salary would still have a major impact. - Many cap-subject H-1B roles (especially entry-level tech, analysts, QA, junior engineers, business roles) are below $100k, even in major metros. - This would: - Eliminate most entry-level hiring - Heavily affect consulting firms and staffing models - Reduce employer willingness to sponsor new graduates - Transfers don’t avoid this impact because the salary requirement would still apply.&lt;br /&gt;
# Transfers don’t mean “no impact.” - Even if someone is already in the U.S., a higher wage floor: - Forces renegotiation or termination - Limits role mobility - Concentrates visas in large firms only&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line:&lt;br /&gt;
❌ The claim that “most H-1Bs are L-1 or other visa transfers, so a $100k rule won’t have much impact” is not true.&lt;br /&gt;
✅ A $100k threshold would significantly reduce H-1B usage, especially for new hires and early-career roles, regardless of transfer status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ChatGPT Shares]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:openai]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lukegao</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>