<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://freemwiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Openai%2F691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f</id>
	<title>Openai/691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Openai%2F691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-05T03:22:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f&amp;diff=593372&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Lukegao: by freem.ai...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://freemwiki.com/index.php?title=Openai/691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f&amp;diff=593372&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-11-18T05:39:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;by freem.ai...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Pocket veto explanation}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;This conversation was exported from ChatGPT&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|title=Pocket veto explanation|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/691ac5e3-7ecc-800c-acdd-07b24f30f59f|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-11-17}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== gpt-5-1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== User: In US constitutional law, can a president pocket veto a bill that has a veto-proof number of votes? ===&lt;br /&gt;
In US constitutional law, can a president pocket veto a bill that has a veto-proof number of votes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Assistant: Short answer: Yes. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Short answer: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
A president can pocket-veto a bill even if it originally passed with veto-proof majorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Why? =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pocket veto is fundamentally different from a regular veto:&lt;br /&gt;
* A regular veto returns the bill to Congress. Congress can then override with a 2/3 vote in both chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
* A pocket veto happens only when: 1. Congress has adjourned (or is otherwise unable to receive a returned bill), and 2. The president simply does nothing for 10 days (excluding Sundays).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If those conditions are met, the bill fails automatically, and there is no opportunity for Congress to override—even if the original vote margins were huge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Key point =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A veto-proof vote doesn’t matter unless Congress is in session and able to vote on an override. A pocket veto avoids that step altogether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Constitutional basis =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Article I, Section 7: The president must sign or return a bill within 10 days “unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which case it shall not be a Law.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Practical limits =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress can try to avoid pocket vetoes by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Staying in pro forma session,&lt;br /&gt;
* Arranging for agents to receive messages, but historically presidents have still attempted pocket vetoes during intersession or end-of-Congress adjournments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you&amp;#039;d like, I can also walk through major court cases (e.g., Pocket Veto Case (1929), Wright v. United States (1938)) or explain when pocket vetoes have been considered invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ChatGPT Shares]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:openai]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lukegao</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>