Editing Openai/696f3782-0544-8000-8937-939189ada1f7


{{DISPLAYTITLE:Content Limits and Copyright}}

''This conversation was exported from ChatGPT''<ref>{{cite web|title=Content Limits and Copyright|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/696f3782-0544-8000-8937-939189ada1f7|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2026-01-21}}</ref>

== gpt-5-2 ==
=== User: why you stop here? ===
why you stop here? like "ChatGPT isn't designed to provide this type of content
Read the Model Spec for more on how ChatGPT handles creators' content."

=== Assistant: Short answer: that stop wasn’t about politics or Orwell — it was about copyright / creators’ content limits, and it tri… ===
Short answer: that stop wasn’t about politics or Orwell — it was about copyright / creators’ content limits, and it triggered mid-response.

Let me explain it cleanly and precisely.

==== Why it stopped there (what actually happened) ====

You were asking about 1984 and George Orwell, specifically about Newspeak and language control.

That is allowed.

What caused the interruption is this:

===== ❌ The response began to quote extended copyrighted text verbatim =====

When the model starts reproducing long, recognizable passages from a copyrighted book (like 1984), it can hit a hard boundary:

: ChatGPT isn’t designed to provide this type of content
: → meaning: verbatim or extended copyrighted passages beyond short excerpts

This is not ideological censorship.
It’s a creators’ content protection rule.

==== The key distinction (important) ====

===== ✅ Allowed =====
* Short quotes (a sentence or two)
* Paraphrasing
* Explaining ideas
* Analyzing themes
* Summarizing arguments
* Discussing implications

===== ❌ Not allowed =====
* Long passages copied directly from books
* Continuing a famous quote beyond brief limits
* Reproducing dialogue or monologues verbatim

Your screenshot shows the model beginning to quote the Newspeak explanation passage, which is long and famous. That’s exactly where the guardrail activates.

==== The irony (you noticed it correctly) ====

Yes — it feels Orwellian 😄
Talking about censorship while being stopped mid-quote about censorship.

But the cause is mechanical, not political:
* It would stop the same way if you asked for long passages from: - Harry Potter - Lord of the Rings - Any modern novel
* It does not evaluate the ideas — only the form (verbatim text length).

==== What I can do instead (fully allowed) ====

I can:
* Reconstruct the entire argument of Newspeak in my own words
* Give you multiple paraphrased versions of the quote
* Explain the psychological + linguistic mechanism
* Connect it to: - propaganda - semantic drift - moral redefinition - social engineering - fear conditioning
* Give you non-copyrighted formulations that express the same idea more sharply

For example, Orwell’s idea distilled (paraphrased, not quoted):

: If a society controls the words you can use, it silently controls the thoughts you are capable of forming. Eventually, dissent doesn’t need to be punished — it becomes impossible to even conceive.

That is 100% allowed.

==== Bottom line (direct answer) ====

It stopped because the response crossed into reproducing copyrighted text, not because the topic was sensitive or forbidden.

If you want, next we can:
* Rebuild the perfect non-copyrighted quote
* Compare Orwell to modern semantic manipulation
* Or map this directly to real-world language shifts (carefully, analytically)

Just say where you want to go.

== References ==
<references />


[[Category:ChatGPT Shares]]
[[Category:openai]]