Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691b7dfb-8d4c-8006-b835-54f81173b3df
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{DISPLAYTITLE:RFE response strategy}} ''This conversation was exported from ChatGPT''<ref>{{cite web|title=RFE response strategy|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/691b7dfb-8d4c-8006-b835-54f81173b3df|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-11-18}}</ref> == gpt-5-1 == === User: Here is some post from someone on Reddit, what would you suggest === Here is some post from someone on Reddit, what would you suggest === Assistant: Here’s how I’d look at this situation — calmly, realistically, and strategically: === Here’s how I’d look at this situation — calmly, realistically, and strategically: ===== A lot of people panic when they see an RFE, but in most TN cases (especially CSA / Engineer / PM roles), RFEs are very fixable as long as the response is strong and detailed. ===== The main issue here is poorly written job duties, which is extremely common when HR or lawyers submit generic language. USCIS is basically saying: : That’s fixable. A well-written RFE response usually solves this. ===== 1. The job duties were too vague ===== # The RFE support was submitted without review # USCIS wants proof the job fits the Engineer classification # They want: - A detailed duty breakdown - A manager reference letter - Org chart - Evidence of technical work (not just “managing tasks”) ===== I strongly agree with the lawyer on this part. ===== If you try to do this while USCIS is reviewing your case, a CBP officer may say: : And the risk is: * They cancel your current TN * They refuse you entry * They add notes to your file Not guaranteed — but a very real risk. ===== Best path: ===== * Submit a strong response to the RFE * Wait for approval * Then move forward cleanly The RFE already tells you what USCIS wants. Give it to them in detail — problem solved. ===== It depends: ===== Worst case: USCIS denies the petition → You still have your current TN, valid until expiration → You can keep working for the old employer → You can apply again with: * Better duties * Better lawyer * Better packet A denial is a setback, not the end. ===== Not really — IF they respond properly. ===== This type of RFE is: * Very normal * Very common * Very often approved The danger only comes if: * The job description really is non-technical, or * The lawyer responds weakly ===== 1. Stop thinking about the border option ===== It’s too risky. USCIS already has the file. # Fix the job duties properly They should: * Be technical * Mention tools, systems, and methods * Show engineering analysis, not just scheduling Something like: : —not: : # Get the manager reference letter right Must clearly say: : # Respond fast, but with quality Do not rush a low-effort reply. But do not wait 70 days either. ===== - Do not try to enter while an RFE is open ===== * Fix the duties & documentation * Let the lawyer respond properly * This RFE is survivable * A denial is not the end * A clean approval now keeps everything simple If you are in a similar situation with your TN petition: You have a BIG advantage: You already know what USCIS wants, and you’re building that into your support letter ''before filing''. === User: What if the uscis denies the visa and then can this person enter again through POE? === What if the uscis denies the visa and then can this person enter again through POE? === Assistant: Short answer: Yes, they can still go to a Port of Entry afterward — it's not automatically blocked. === Short answer: Yes, they ''can'' still go to a Port of Entry afterward — it's not automatically blocked. But it depends on timing, evidence, and how the denial happened. Let’s break it down realistically: === 💡 Key Rule: === A USCIS denial does NOT permanently block you from getting a TN at the border. TN classification is decided two ways: # USCIS (if filing I-129 from inside the U.S.) # CBP at the border (POE / pre-clearance) They are separate pathways — they don’t cancel each other out. === If USCIS Denies the TN Petition === Here’s what happens: ===== ❌ The I-129 is denied ===== * You cannot start the new job under USCIS approval * But your current TN status stays valid (if you have one and haven’t quit) USCIS denial does NOT = deportation, ban, or blacklist. === Can they still try at a border afterward? === ===== Yes — but with strategy. ===== Think of it like: : “USCIS said no — but I have new evidence, here it is, let’s try again.” CBP is allowed to approve a TN even after USCIS rejected one. It happens all the time. === But here's the catch: === They must fix the problem that caused the denial. If the denial was because: * duties didn’t match the profession * insufficient proof * vague job duties Then going to the border with the same weak package = very likely refusal again. === Best-case path after a denial: === ✔ Stronger job letter ✔ Fix job title if needed ✔ More technical duties ✔ Manager letter ✔ Org chart ✔ Degree + transcripts ✔ Employer support letter ✔ TN category clearly stated And then: ➡ Go to Victoria / Toronto / Vancouver / Montreal / land border ➡ Present the new packet ➡ Argue the case properly === What’s the risk at POE after denial? === ⭐ They might approve it — happens often ⭐ They might ask questions — be prepared ⚠ They could say: : “USCIS just denied this. Prove why we should approve it.” Worst case: ❌ They refuse the TN ❌ You're told to re-apply later They do ''not'' ban you or cancel your existing TN. === Important Scenario === If they still have a valid TN with another employer, they can: # Enter on the current TN # Work for the old employer # Re-file properly later So the new job is delayed — not lost forever. === The Real Danger Is: === If the person: * already quit their old job * already moved * has no fallback TN Then denial = serious trouble. === Summary in simple terms: === USCIS denial ≠ permanent block You can still go to a border. But: * You need a stronger application * You need to fix what USCIS objected to * CBP must be convinced the job fits the TN category A LOT of TN approvals happen after USCIS denials. It just has to be handled smartly. If you want, NEXT I can: * Tell you exactly how to rebuild a TN packet after denial * Help you rewrite the job duties to satisfy CSA category * Show how to prepare a border strategy that works even after an RFE/denial == References == <references /> [[Category:ChatGPT Shares]] [[Category:openai]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css
(
edit
)