Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Goal: test if a simple QAT geometric model can produce the observed fine-structure constant === α = e24πε0 ℏc\alpha \;=\; \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \,\hbar c}α=4πε0ℏce2 by expressing e2e^2e2 and/or eee in geometric terms of a spherical surface (surface radius rrr, surface charge density σ\sigmaσ, plus the action scale h/2πh/2\pih/2π). We’ll treat α\alphaα as a derived quantity: # Model the total charge eee as charge density σ\sigmaσ over a sphere of area 4πr24\pi r^24πr2: e≈σ⋅4πr2⇒e2≈σ2(4πr2)2=16π2 σ2 r4.e \approx \sigma \cdot 4\pi r^2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad e^2 \approx \sigma^2 (4\pi r^2)^2 = 16\pi^2 \,\sigma^2 \, r^4 .e≈σ⋅4πr2⇒e2≈σ2(4πr2)2=16π2σ2r4. (This is a simple model — we'll discuss refinements afterwards.) # Plug that into the usual expression for α: α(σ,r) = e24πε0 ℏc = 16π2 σ2 r44πε0 ℏc = 4π σ2 r4ε0 ℏc.\alpha(\sigma,r) \;=\; \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \,\hbar c} \;=\; \frac{16\pi^2 \,\sigma^2 \, r^4}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \,\hbar c} \;=\; \frac{4\pi \,\sigma^2 \, r^4}{\varepsilon_0 \,\hbar c}.α(σ,r)=4πε0ℏce2=4πε0ℏc16π2σ2r4=ε0ℏc4πσ2r4. (I’ll leave ℏ=h/2π\hbar = h/2\piℏ=h/2π explicitly in the code and algebra if you prefer.) # Ask: what (σ,r)(\sigma,r)(σ,r) produce α≈1/137.035999…\alpha \approx 1/137.035999\ldotsα≈1/137.035999… ? More specifically: - Fix a range of plausible radii rrr (from subatomic up to atomic scales) and see what surface charge density σ\sigmaσ is required to match α. - Alternatively fix σ\sigmaσ (e.g., one elementary charge distributed on the sphere, or surface charge density coming from plasma/temperature models) and see predicted α. # If the simple surface-charge model is not close, try small refinements: - Allow for an “effective fraction” factor fff so e=f⋅σ⋅4πr2e = f \cdot \sigma \cdot 4\pi r^2e=f⋅σ⋅4πr2 (to model concave/convex partitioning or incomplete coverage). - Consider event-rate / quantization corrections (photon exchange rate, Planck-time scale) as a secondary parameter.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)