Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== - The numeric closeness of GA and 1/α is suggestive and could be meaningful if there is a geometric mechanism that relates the Golden Ratio (and angle) to electromagnetic coupling. But numerically we do not have equality — just a ~0.34% mismatch. ===
* Small-integer linear combinations of simple constants can be fitted to match almost any target number at some precision (this is the danger of numerology). The fact that a combination of GA, π, e, φ fits better than GA alone does not by itself prove physical significance; it only shows there exist small rational linear fits.
* For physics, what matters is a clear mechanism or derivation that makes a simple, unique prediction (preferably exact or with testable small corrections). QAT’s idea — that spherical geometry and the golden-angle-like geometry underly α — remains plausible as a geometric hypothesis, but we need either: - a derivation that gives α from first principles in QAT geometry (with a physical parameter that controls the small difference), or - a sharp, testable prediction (e.g., a small variation of α under specific physical conditions) that experiments can check.