Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Top AI model on December 31
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== '''A discussion thread about an AI model leaderboard, primarily focusing on the competition between Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT''' == This image contains a discussion thread about an AI model leaderboard, primarily focusing on the competition between Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT (especially the new 4o version). The conversation spans roughly a week and involves numerous users sharing their opinions, observations, and predictions. Here's a breakdown of the key points: * '''Main Focus: Gemini vs. ChatGPT:''' The central theme is the ongoing battle for the top spot on the leaderboard between Gemini and ChatGPT. Many users believe they are currently neck and neck or very close. * '''Positive and Negative Views on Gemini:''' Some users are impressed with Gemini's performance, especially in certain areas like reasoning and on platforms like Imarena. They see it as a potentially underestimated "thinking" model. However, others are critical, calling it "bad" or "overrated," and express concerns about its training data. There's even a comment about the Gemini logo being incorrect. * '''Expectations for ChatGPT (and 4o):''' ChatGPT is still considered a strong contender, particularly with the release of its new 4o version. Users are anticipating further updates and are discussing its strengths, sometimes noting it excels in conversation even if it lags in certain logic tasks compared to Gemini. Some believe ChatGPT is currently undervalued. * '''Discussion of Other Models:''' Besides Gemini and ChatGPT, other models are mentioned, including: ** '''Claude:''' Seen as a strong competitor by some. ** '''Grok:''' There's curiosity about Grok 3, but also dismissive comments. ** '''O1:''' Considered an up-and-coming model with good reasoning abilities, potentially challenging the leaders. The "o1-preview" version is even suggested as being better than ChatGPT 4o in some aspects. ** '''Opus:''' Speculation exists about a potential future release from Google. ** '''Anonymous Chatbot:''' Some believe an anonymous chatbot might win. * '''Leaderboard Mechanics and Rules:''' Users discuss how the leaderboard works, including the tie-breaking rule (alphabetical order of model names). The Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard is mentioned as the data source. There are questions about the frequency of updates and concerns about potential manipulation by "whales" (users with significant voting power). * '''Market Implications:''' There's a brief mention of the market share and growth of different AI chatbots. * '''Key Dates:''' December 31st is highlighted as a potentially significant date related to the leaderboard results. * '''User Sentiment:''' The overall tone of the thread is active and engaged, with users passionately sharing their opinions and predictions. There's a mix of excitement about new models and updates, as well as skepticism and disagreement regarding the performance of specific models, particularly Gemini. In summary, the discussion thread provides a snapshot of the dynamic and competitive landscape of AI models, with a strong focus on the ongoing rivalry between Gemini and ChatGPT and the anticipation surrounding future releases and leaderboard updates.<sup>22</sup>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)