编辑“
Top AI model on December 31
”(章节)
跳到导航
跳到搜索
警告:
您没有登录。如果您做出任意编辑,您的IP地址将会公开可见。如果您
登录
或
创建
一个账户,您的编辑将归属于您的用户名,且将享受其他好处。
反垃圾检查。
不要
加入这个!
== '''A discussion thread about an AI model leaderboard, primarily focusing on the competition between Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT''' == This image contains a discussion thread about an AI model leaderboard, primarily focusing on the competition between Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT (especially the new 4o version). The conversation spans roughly a week and involves numerous users sharing their opinions, observations, and predictions. Here's a breakdown of the key points: * '''Main Focus: Gemini vs. ChatGPT:''' The central theme is the ongoing battle for the top spot on the leaderboard between Gemini and ChatGPT. Many users believe they are currently neck and neck or very close. * '''Positive and Negative Views on Gemini:''' Some users are impressed with Gemini's performance, especially in certain areas like reasoning and on platforms like Imarena. They see it as a potentially underestimated "thinking" model. However, others are critical, calling it "bad" or "overrated," and express concerns about its training data. There's even a comment about the Gemini logo being incorrect. * '''Expectations for ChatGPT (and 4o):''' ChatGPT is still considered a strong contender, particularly with the release of its new 4o version. Users are anticipating further updates and are discussing its strengths, sometimes noting it excels in conversation even if it lags in certain logic tasks compared to Gemini. Some believe ChatGPT is currently undervalued. * '''Discussion of Other Models:''' Besides Gemini and ChatGPT, other models are mentioned, including: ** '''Claude:''' Seen as a strong competitor by some. ** '''Grok:''' There's curiosity about Grok 3, but also dismissive comments. ** '''O1:''' Considered an up-and-coming model with good reasoning abilities, potentially challenging the leaders. The "o1-preview" version is even suggested as being better than ChatGPT 4o in some aspects. ** '''Opus:''' Speculation exists about a potential future release from Google. ** '''Anonymous Chatbot:''' Some believe an anonymous chatbot might win. * '''Leaderboard Mechanics and Rules:''' Users discuss how the leaderboard works, including the tie-breaking rule (alphabetical order of model names). The Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard is mentioned as the data source. There are questions about the frequency of updates and concerns about potential manipulation by "whales" (users with significant voting power). * '''Market Implications:''' There's a brief mention of the market share and growth of different AI chatbots. * '''Key Dates:''' December 31st is highlighted as a potentially significant date related to the leaderboard results. * '''User Sentiment:''' The overall tone of the thread is active and engaged, with users passionately sharing their opinions and predictions. There's a mix of excitement about new models and updates, as well as skepticism and disagreement regarding the performance of specific models, particularly Gemini. In summary, the discussion thread provides a snapshot of the dynamic and competitive landscape of AI models, with a strong focus on the ongoing rivalry between Gemini and ChatGPT and the anticipation surrounding future releases and leaderboard updates.<sup>22</sup>
摘要:
请注意,您对freem的所有贡献都可能被其他贡献者编辑,修改或删除。如果您不希望您的文字被任意修改和再散布,请不要提交。
您同时也要向我们保证您所提交的内容是您自己所作,或得自一个不受版权保护或相似自由的来源(参阅
Freem:版权
的细节)。
未经许可,请勿提交受版权保护的作品!
取消
编辑帮助
(在新窗口中打开)
导航菜单
个人工具
未登录
讨论
贡献
创建账号
登录
命名空间
页面
讨论
不转换
不转换
简体
繁體
大陆简体
香港繁體
澳門繁體
大马简体
新加坡简体
臺灣正體
查看
阅读
编辑
编辑源代码
查看历史
更多
导航
首页
最近更改
随机页面
MediaWiki帮助
工具
链入页面
相关更改
特殊页面
页面信息