Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693d9381-2330-8009-a7bb-7ef5e9777a3f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Thanks for sharing the exact pitch — this is very important to unpack, because the way it’s being described is not how … === Thanks for sharing the exact pitch — this is very important to unpack, because the way it’s being described is not how licensed takaful / insurance products are normally structured. I’ll break this down clearly and flag what is realistic vs what is a red flag, especially since this sounds like it’s being linked to Sun Enrich Extra-i (or something marketed alongside it). ==== 1️⃣ The “RM20k per year × 5 years” part ==== ✅ This part is plausible Sun Enrich Extra-i does commonly use: * RM20,000 per year * 5-year limited contribution * Total contributions = RM100,000 So far, this aligns with real takaful structures. ==== 2️⃣ “9% annual interest payout in cash” ==== ⚠️ This is where wording becomes misleading ===== What takaful products actually do: ===== * They do NOT guarantee “interest” * They pay non-guaranteed surplus / cash payouts * Returns depend on: - Universal account performance - Company surplus declaration - No fixed “interest rate” like a bank FD 👉 If someone says “9% interest payout”, what they really mean is: : “Illustrated (projected) annual payout assuming good performance” 📌 Key point: 9% is NOT guaranteed and not contractual ==== 3️⃣ Early withdrawal penalty (30%, 25%, etc.) ==== ✅ This is realistic, but misunderstood Most limited-pay takaful plans: * Have high surrender charges in early years * Penalties decrease over time * Exist to recover: - Wakalah fees - Distribution & admin costs ⚠️ BUT: * The penalty is not a “fine” * It’s a low surrender value, not money being taken arbitrarily * It’s usually based on account value, not strictly “RM20k deposited” If they said “30% out of RM20k” — that’s an oversimplification, not contract wording. ==== 4️⃣ “After 5 years, RM100k can be withdrawn anytime” ==== ⚠️ Half-truth Reality: * You can withdraw after the contribution period * BUT: - Full RM100k depends on account value - Early cash payouts already received reduce remaining value - There may still be partial charges or lower value if withdrawn too soon 👉 It is not equivalent to a fixed deposit maturity. ==== 5️⃣ “18% interest for another 10 years” 🚩🚩🚩 ==== This is the BIGGEST RED FLAG ===== ❌ Why this is NOT realistic: ===== * No licensed takaful or insurance product in Malaysia guarantees 18% * Even illustrated returns rarely exceed 8–10% * Bank Negara regulations do not allow guaranteed high returns ===== What this might actually mean: ===== One of these: # Cumulative illustrated return, not annual # Internal rate of return (IRR) misrepresented # Reinvestment illustration, assuming: - All payouts reinvested - Strong market performance # A sales tactic mixing multiple projections 📌 If 18% were real and guaranteed: * EPF, insurers, and banks would all be obsolete * It would violate financial product regulations ==== 6️⃣ Bottom line — how to interpret this offer ==== ===== ✅ What is likely TRUE: ===== * RM20k/year × 5 years structure * Cash payout concept * Early surrender penalties * Optional reinvestment ===== ❌ What is MISLEADING or WRONG: ===== * Using the word “interest” * Quoting 9% or 18% as if guaranteed * Suggesting FD-like certainty * Oversimplifying penalties ==== 7️⃣ What you should ask BEFORE committing (very important) ==== Ask for these in writing: # Guaranteed vs non-guaranteed benefits table # Benefit Illustration (BI) — low (4%) & high (6–8%) scenarios # Exact: - Surrender value year by year - Cash payout amount year by year # Confirmation: - “Is 9% or 18% guaranteed?” (If yes → walk away immediately) ==== My honest take ==== This sounds like a high-pressure sales pitch that exaggerates projections. The underlying product may be legitimate, but the returns are almost certainly overstated. If you want, you can: * Paste the Benefit Illustration numbers * Or upload a screenshot (remove personal details) I can then tell you exactly what the real return looks like — no sales spin.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)