Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6920370e-af50-8007-985e-1645172973a6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 方向 4:保障選舉/公投程序之完整與透明 ===== 主張:明定選舉與公投辦理的最高標準,如:電子投票安全、海外投票防干預、媒體公平報導、公投與選舉不得交叉利益運用。 為什麼能反制:在藍白控制國會、多數席次情境下,選舉及公投程序若被弱化、被操作,將進一步削弱民主基底。中華科技大學<ref>{{cite web|title=中華科技大學|url=https://www.ccu.edu.tw/p/406-1000-58231%2Cr982.php?Lang=zh-tw|publisher=ccu.edu.tw|access-date=2025-11-22}}</ref> 公投提案可把「程序完整性」做為守護項目。 可能的主文範例:「你是否同意:對於全國性公民投票/總統立委選舉,應設立由國際觀察員與公民監督機制,並於投票結果公告前,公開監察報告,確保無重大程序瑕疵?」 補充條件:要定義監察機制、觀察員資格、報告時限。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)