Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/672190ec-af50-800e-b8b7-2633d2f79997
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Present-day human armaments would certainly provide an edge over the weaponry available to the UNSC during the Covenant… === Present-day human armaments would certainly provide an edge over the weaponry available to the UNSC during the Covenant-Human War. Advanced 21st-century military tech like drones, stealth aircraft, and precision-guided munitions would allow humanity to exploit some of the Covenant’s weaknesses. Here’s how modern tech would fare against Covenant forces: ===== Aerial Superiority: Modern Fighter Jets and Apache Helicopters ===== # F-22 Raptors and Advanced Fighter Jets: The F-22 and similar stealth fighters would give humans a major advantage in aerial engagements. Their radar-evading capabilities and speed would help avoid detection by Covenant ground units and aircraft. F-22s equipped with advanced missiles and high-powered Gatling guns could target Covenant dropships, Banshees, and even lighter armored vehicles like Ghosts with precision. # Apache Helicopters and Close-Air Support: Apache helicopters, with their advanced targeting systems and missile capabilities, would be effective against Covenant infantry and lightly armored targets. However, Apaches would be vulnerable to plasma fire due to their lower speed and visibility compared to jets. They’d excel in hit-and-run tactics and could be particularly devastating when coordinated with ground forces to provide direct support. ===== Navy and Naval Air Support ===== # Aircraft Carriers and Carrier-Based Aircraft: Modern aircraft carriers could be deployed to supply a steady stream of jets, helicopters, and drones into battle zones, creating concentrated air superiority. This would allow humans to launch rapid-response air support, delivering missile strikes against Covenant positions from a safe distance. # Missile Destroyers and Submarines: Naval ships armed with long-range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles would allow for precision strikes against high-value Covenant targets from offshore positions. Additionally, submarines could evade Covenant detection, potentially launching devastating torpedo and missile strikes from underwater. ===== Ground Advantages: Drones and Advanced Artillery ===== # Drones: Modern drones (like the MQ-9 Reaper and other UCAVs) would provide critical intelligence, surveillance, and long-range strike capabilities. Drones could track Covenant movements, pinpoint positions, and launch precision attacks on infantry and vehicles while staying relatively safe from direct confrontation. Armed drones could also deliver steady fire support, disrupting Covenant formations before they engage human forces directly. # Advanced Artillery: Modern artillery systems, like the M270 MLRS or HIMARS, could provide significant range and precision, devastating Covenant positions from a distance. With GPS-guided munitions, humans could neutralize Covenant staging areas and landing zones with precision that the UNSC didn’t have. However, Covenant energy shielding might limit the effectiveness of traditional ballistic rounds on specific targets. ===== Possible Limitations Against the Covenant ===== # Vulnerability to Plasma Weaponry: Despite advanced armor, present-day human vehicles and aircraft remain vulnerable to Covenant plasma weaponry. A single hit from a plasma mortar or a direct shot from a plasma cannon could destroy helicopters, tanks, or drones due to the high energy output. Modern equipment would have to rely heavily on mobility, tactics, and stealth rather than direct confrontation with Covenant heavy units. # Shielding Technology: Covenant forces, particularly Elites and higher-ranking infantry, come equipped with personal energy shields that could resist lighter human munitions. However, concentrated fire from high-caliber rounds, particularly from autocannons and precision-guided weapons, would likely be effective at breaking shields with sustained pressure. # Logistics and Sustainability: Modern warfare relies heavily on complex logistical networks. Covenant forces could disrupt supply lines, making it difficult for humans to maintain prolonged engagements without heavy losses. Covenant ships could still strike key infrastructure from orbit, weakening human logistics without resorting to full-scale glassing. ===== Conclusion: Could Present-Day Weapons Tip the Balance? ===== Present-day human technology would definitely provide a more formidable opposition and could tip the scales in favor of humans in a sustained ground war. Enhanced stealth, long-range strike capabilities, and the precision of modern drones and guided munitions would give humanity tactical advantages, allowing them to conduct effective asymmetrical warfare against the Covenant. In a prolonged conflict, humans using 21st-century technology could force a highly costly and prolonged engagement for the Covenant, potentially leading to a situation where the Covenant re-evaluates whether attempting to conquer Earth without glassing it is worth the effort. In short, with modern weaponry, humans might not decisively win, but they could inflict enough losses to make it an unfeasible campaign for the Covenant, creating the conditions for a potential stalemate or eventual withdrawal.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)