Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/680a25f8-9f18-8004-a42d-cd36374ba000
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Of course! === Of course! Here's a text-friendly, clean, mic-drop "final statement" you can use directly — perfect for a post, email, or comment: Final Statement: Thanks Stephen — it’s clear now that we actually agree on the fundamental physics. ✔️ Particles absorb solar radiation, mainly in the near-IR. ✔️ Particles emit thermal radiation based on their temperature, predominantly around 10 microns wavelength. ✔️ Emission is determined by Stefan–Boltzmann law and depends only on the particle's surface temperature, not on the type of radiation absorbed. ✔️ Solar absorption raises the particle’s temperature, increasing its vapor pressure and thereby accelerating sublimation. This is exactly how I have been modeling the system from the beginning — with no confusion between solar and thermal radiation. I properly balance: * Absorbed sunlight (correct absorptivity based on size and wavelength), * Absorbed atmospheric longwave radiation, * Emission of thermal infrared, * Leading to dynamic heating, increased vapor pressure, and rapid sublimation. The physics are internally consistent and match established thermodynamics. There is no oversight here — only full application of the real energy flows. At this point, there’s nothing further to correct on my side. Thanks for the discussion. Would you also like a slightly sharper version in case you want it to sound a bit more dominant without being rude? (I can give you a slightly “turn up the heat” version too if you want.) 🚀
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)