Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69109937-2170-8005-9304-da49840bb5b9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Not investment advice, obviously – just a structured way to think about it. I’ll use loose price ranges to avoid fake precision. ==== ===== Rough 3–5 year price range: 0–2 USD ===== What has to go wrong: * Manufacturing never quite stabilises: yields at Globetronics/NationGate and SPX stay mediocre; too much spread in coupling, reliability issues under thermal cycling, lots of rework. * Customers don’t scale orders: pilots and low-volume orders continue (like the current 5 M order), but nobody commits to real AI-cluster volumes; Celestial, Luxshare, FIT etc. either delay or quietly pivot to alternatives. * Cash gets burned ahead of revenue: - They have >300 M in the bank now, but heavy capex, opex, and acquisitions eat that over a few years without the corresponding ramp. optics.org<ref>{{cite web|title=optics.org|url=https://optics.org/news/16/10/21|publisher=optics.org|access-date=2025-11-10}}</ref> - The market realises revenue will be far below the AI hype narrative → multiple compression and possibly another dilutive raise at low prices. * Market re-rates all AI-plumbing names: If AI data-center capex slows or investors rotate away from speculative hardware, multiples can be savage. In that world, the equity drifts toward: * “Cash plus IP value”, * Or, in a truly bad outcome, a take-under / asset sale where shareholders only get a fraction of today’s cap. Given today’s ~5.4 USD price, a worst-case 0–2 USD is not outrageous. We’ve seen this movie with many photonics names before. ===== Rough 3–5 year price range: 5–12 USD ===== This is the “boringly successful” outcome. What it looks like: * Globetronics + NationGate + SPX ramp to meaningful volume - Yield improves gradually; customers sign additional production orders (like the recent 5 M order, but larger and repeated). POET Technologies<ref>{{cite web|title=POET Technologies|url=https://www.poet-technologies.com/news/poet-technologies-receives-5-million-production-order-for-800g-optical-engines|publisher=POET Technologies|access-date=2025-11-10}}</ref> - 800G engines go into volume in 2026; 1.6T and some AI-fabric products follow a year or two later. * Revenue climbs, but not explosively - Say low tens of millions → mid-tens of millions USD over a few years, not hundreds of millions yet. - Gross margins decent but not spectacular at the beginning (manufacturing learning curve). * Valuation compresses somewhat as the story matures - Right now you have an enormous P/S because there’s almost no “S” – pure story stock. FullRatio<ref>{{cite web|title=FullRatio|url=https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-poet/poet-technologies|publisher=fullratio.com|access-date=2025-11-10}}</ref> - As revenue appears, the market may reward lower risk, but also apply a more normal multiple (e.g. 8–15× sales instead of 800×). - The share price can still go up if revenue ramps fast enough, but there’s also a real chance that the stock goes mostly sideways while the business “grows into” its valuation. Why the range 5–12 USD? * Downside within this “success” case: - If multiple compresses faster than revenue grows, you can easily end up around today’s price or slightly below (5–7 USD) even with decent execution. * Moderate upside: - If they hit, say, 50–80 M USD of revenue with decent margins and the market still assigns a growthy fibre-optic multiple, a 1–1.5 B market cap is not crazy → roughly 10–15 USD per share, depending on final share count. So in the base case you don’t automatically get your “10-bagger”; you get a real company with moderate upside and non-trivial execution risk on the way. ===== Rough 3–5 year price range: 20–40 USD (and beyond if everything really clicks) ===== This is the full-throttle bull story people dream about: * POET firmly becomes the “default” optical-engine supplier for a non-trivial slice of AI data-centre and CPO markets: - Multiple hyperscalers adopt products via Luxshare / Foxconn / others. - Celestial-style AI fabrics ship in numbers, with POET’s light engines baked into their solutions. - Sivers+POET ELS for CPO actually takes off around end-2026 as planned. PR Newswire<ref>{{cite web|title=PR Newswire|url=https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sivers-semiconductors-partners-with-poet-technologies-to-deliver-innovative-light-engines-and-strengthen-serviceable-market-offerings-in-next-gen-ai-infrastructure-302606753.html|publisher=PR Newswire|access-date=2025-11-10}}</ref> * Revenue runs into the hundreds of millions - Think 200–400 M USD+ annual sales within 5 years, with attractive gross margins if passive alignment really delivers cost advantage at scale. * Valuation: still high, but justified by growth - At that point you’re not a tiny speculative any more; you’re a meaningful photonics player in a structural growth market. - A tech market might easily give 5–10× sales to a company growing 30–40 %+ per year, which would be 1–4 B USD market cap. Rough translation into per-share price: * 1 B market cap → about 2× today → low teens. * 2–3 B → roughly 20–30 USD. * 4 B+ with continued hype → 30–40 USD+. Is this impossible? No. Is it already partly in the price? Also yes. The market knows AI optical connectivity is hot; the current ~0.5–0.7 B cap reflects that. Yahoo Finanzen<ref>{{cite web|title=Yahoo Finanzen|url=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/poet-technologies-stock-buy-110000055.html|publisher=Yahoo Finanzen|access-date=2025-11-10}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)