Editing Openai/695c860c-fb24-8010-a014-a687d2d61cb3 (section)

=== User: Also, "arising under" does not self-limit to the narrow reading of "because of". ===
Also, "arising under" does not self-limit to the narrow reading of "because of". An injury is eligible for redress even if it did not originate as a consequence of the textual contents implementation of this Constitution. The Courts are structured to afford relief and jurisdiction is already expressly granted over controversies that arise independent of the text, provisions and implementation of the Constitution. This is the majority of the text in Article 3. All of the states operate "under" the United States Constitution by mutual compact, and are expressly bound by its Supremacy clause. Hence a controversy need not arise "because of" a particular constitutional clause or declaration of right in order to "arise under" the Constitution. To say so is to contradict directly the majority of the jurisdiction granted in Article 3.