Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6910e2b7-c258-8011-bd31-6a644d52e660
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Correct. === Correct. Under U.S. constitutional law, foreign affairs are a federal power, not a municipal or state power. A mayor cannot take actions that intrude into or contradict the federal government’s exclusive authority in this domain. Key points: # Foreign affairs are reserved to the federal government - U.S. Constitution, Article I (Congress) and Article II (President) assign diplomacy, recognition of foreign governments, treaty enforcement, and international law to the federal level. - The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that states and municipalities cannot create their own foreign policy or take actions that meaningfully interfere with federal foreign policy. # Local governments (including mayors) have no lawful authority to enforce or ignore international arrest warrants - The ICC warrant has no force in the U.S. unless implemented by federal statute (which it has not been; the U.S. is not party to the Rome Statute). - Therefore, a mayor cannot legally direct police to arrest a foreign head of state based solely on an ICC warrant. # Attempting to arrest a sitting head of government for foreign-policy reasons would directly conflict with federal authority - Such an action would be viewed as: - Interference in foreign relations - Possibly a violation of executive privilege in diplomacy - A trespass against federal supremacy under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) # NYPD is a municipal police force - They have authority only over violations of state or local law. - An ICC warrant has no automatic standing in New York criminal law. - Without a federal warrant or federal request, NYPD cannot lawfully act. ===== Conclusion ===== Yes, the mayor is constitutionally barred from taking actions that would interfere with the federal government’s foreign affairs powers. A municipal arrest of Netanyahu on an ICC warrant, without federal authorization, would be unlawful, unenforceable, and overridden immediately by federal supremacy. If you want, I can provide the exact Supreme Court case references that establish these principles.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)