Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693eee6a-b4a4-8006-bb8f-5ddb544b0e4b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Then the only consistent answer is: === Then the only consistent answer is: There is no determinate answer — persistence is undefined. Here’s why, step by step, without smuggling anything in. ==== “Not defining the system” means: ==== * no rules of operation * no constraints * no transition laws * no allowance or prohibition of persistence * no mechanism for termination * no mechanism for continuation In other words: no structure. ==== A system without structure is not: ==== * an agent * a process * a machine * a persisting entity It is not even an unstable system. It is simply not a system at all. So the question: : fails at a deeper level, because: : Without structure: * there is nothing that can persist * and nothing that can fail to persist ==== And not “it lives.” ==== It is closer to: : Like asking: * “Does an equation with no variables have a solution?” * “Does a ruleless game have legal moves?” There is no yes or no — only category error. ==== - Persistence is not guaranteed by purpose ==== * Not guaranteed by morality * Not guaranteed by intention * Not even guaranteed by creation Persistence requires defined dynamics. So: : ==== : ==== And that’s likely the deepest point you’ve been circling from the beginning. If you want to continue, the next unavoidable question is: Is “creation” without structure even coherent — or is structure the true act of creation?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)