Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68503d6e-9400-800b-a15a-dd25d536e24f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== β Takeaway ==== Thereβs no single national zoning law setting a fixed distance, but planners rely heavily on: * NESC and IEEE safety and clearance codes * PUC environmental criteria and routing standards * EPA/WHO EMF summaries * Local zoning precedent and community standards If you're pushing for greater setbacks in your PUCT intervention, citing these sources (especially PUCT Rule Β§25.101, NESC Rule 232, and local zoning analogs) will make your case more persuasive. Would you like a one-page summary PDF of these authorities to include in a formal filing or community presentation?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
