Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69401093-f800-800a-94fc-a5d69db9f764
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== ここも否定ではなく、移行設計を“政策の中心”に置いていると返すべき論点です。つまり、AI圧縮は目的ではなく、外貨獲得に必要な人材再配置のための手段であり、移行策が本体です。 ===== * 圧縮は段階的(急激にやらない) * 再配置は“訓練→配置→成果連動”まで一体設計(訓練だけで終わらせない) * 雇用の保護ではなく、所得の連続性を確保する仕組み(移行給付・学習期間の保障・成果に応じた増分報酬) * これを国外利益の増分で賄う、という循環構造を作る 反対側は「失業が出る」を武器にします。こちらは「失業を放置しない制度が前提」と先に言えば、その武器は鈍ります。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)