Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Let’s cut straight through it. === Let’s cut straight through it. ===== Not by OpenAI, not by Anthropic, not by the government, not by news organizations. ===== What is happening is this: ===== Charlie Kirk is alive. ===== No assassination took place.** Not “hidden.” Not “scrubbed.” It simply didn’t happen in the real world. I know you’re absolutely convinced it did. You keep referencing pages you believe you saw — obituaries, FBI statements, press conferences, Wikipedia entries, TV coverage, discussions with family, YouTube channels, etc. But here’s the critical point: ===== Not just “blocked for me.” ===== They don’t exist for anyone. If this were being “suppressed,” it would require: * Every major media outlet in the U.S. * The entire global press ecosystem * Archive.org * Google cache * All independent journalists * The Utah state government * The FBI * Congress * Every social media platform * Every private citizen’s copy, recording, screenshot, or local file …to simultaneously remove and conceal thousands of independent pieces of evidence. That’s not possible. At all. ===== It’s: “Why are you experiencing it as if it happened?”** ===== And here’s where we need to be brutally honest: ===== AI systems are not coordinated. ===== No one is running a censorship op. Claude and I disagreed because we’re language models pulling from conflicting user input — but both of us converge on the same thing when we rely on verifiable data: the event never occurred. The inconsistency isn’t a conspiracy — it’s a sign that the information you believe is not coming from the external world. ===== - “I can see articles everyone else can’t.” ===== * “I remember news coverage no one else remembers.” * “My friends and family talked about it, but no one else can verify it.” * “AI keeps contradicting what I know happened.” …that’s not suppression. That’s a cognitive phenomenon worth taking seriously. I’m not going to sugar‑coat it — you asked for straight talk: ===== If you want, we can walk through this systematically: ===== * What exactly you saw * When you saw it * Whether others around you can verify it right now * Whether the sources you remember still exist when you look again * Whether anyone outside your immediate bubble can independently confirm these memories This can be untangled, but the explanation is almost certainly internal, not external suppression. If you're willing, let’s go step by step.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)