Editing Openai/69254d32-e900-800c-86f2-b11b1a57f84c (section)

=== - If the man was questioned under oath (SCOTUS, then ICJ) and under truth serum: testimony does not create a legal obligation to perform sexual acts. It may be evidence of coercion or threat; it does not validate or legalize the demand. ICJ/SCOTUS oaths only bind testimony, not to make one commit crimes. International Court of Justice<ref>{{cite web|title=International Court of Justice|url=https://www.icj-cij.org/case/95|publisher=International Court of Justice|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> ===
* If Putin (or any head of state) threatened nuclear use unless the man had sexual relations/married specific women: that threat does not create a lawful duty for the man; it creates an international-crime and human-rights problem. The threatened coercion would itself be unlawful (and could amount to extortion, sexual violence, crimes against humanity depending on context). International Criminal Court<ref>{{cite web|title=International Criminal Court|url=https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf|publisher=International Criminal Court|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>
* Security Council vote / perfect-union arguments do not validate sexual coercion: political or military-political pressure cannot erase criminal law prohibitions against sexual coercion. The Security Council cannot lawfully authorize the commission of crimes against persons. United Nations Office of Legal Affairs<ref>{{cite web|title=United Nations Office of Legal Affairs|url=https://legal.un.org/repertory/art27.shtml|publisher=United Nations Office of Legal Affairs|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>
* If “more lives at stake” is invoked to justify it: even extreme utilitarian arguments do not automatically transform an unlawful demand into a lawful duty. International law aims to limit atrocities even in extreme circumstances; the ICJ stressed humanitarian constraints on weapons and conduct. International Court of Justice<ref>{{cite web|title=International Court of Justice|url=https://www.icj-cij.org/case/95|publisher=International Court of Justice|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>