Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== Using the scale: ====
* 0 = Do NOT trust a single word they ever say
* 100 = Trust everything they say without question

Loctarjay:
* High logical rigor, consistent falsifiable evidence, careful probability analysis, transparency.
* Minor potential biases: occasional tone/emotional language in debate.
* Score: 74 / 100

Captain Blue:
* Weak application of logic, over-reliance on anecdote, selective evidence, personal narrative overrides falsifiable proof.
* Slight credit for attempting to reference AI/fact-checking tools.
* Score: 8 / 100

===== |     |     |     | =====
| --- | --- | --- |
|     |     |     |
|     |     |     |

This reflects original claims and arguments only, fully neutral, and weighted entirely on logical structure, evidence, and falsifiability.

If you want, I can also produce a visual credibility timeline, showing incremental credibility changes as the conversation progresses, highlighting key events (AI prompts, videos, Steam evidence, etc.) for both participants. This would make it easier to see how each new piece of evidence affects their credibility in real-time.

Do you want me to make that?