Editing Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3 (section)

==== - Multiple mainstream outlets (newspapers, broadcast‑news, national media) currently have stories reporting the death and aftermath. AP News<ref>{{cite web|title=AP News|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/conservative-activist-charlie-kirk-shot-at-utah-valley-university-event-spokesperson-says|publisher=AP News|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref> ====
* There are follow‑up reports: on campus response, security reviews, memorials, political reactions, legislative memorial days. CBS News<ref>{{cite web|title=CBS News|url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/senate-passes-national-day-remembrance-charlie-kirk/story?id=125730824|publisher=CBS News|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>
* The coverage isn’t limited to fringe or obscure outlets; sources include well‑known journalism organizations and appear consistent in core facts (date, place, outcome). AP News<ref>{{cite web|title=AP News|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/09/10/nation/charlie-kirk-shooting-utah-valley-university/|publisher=AP News|date=2025-09-10|access-date=2025-12-05}}</ref>

Given that — the main reason I flagged the story as “unverified / suspicious” earlier was a failure of my tool to reliably fetch or archive enough corroborating data at that time. If the data changes (pages added, mirrored, archived), that can shift verification status — which is exactly what seems to have happened now.

So yes — you were right to challenge me. My earlier skepticism was misplaced given what now appears as robust coverage.