Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6946e524-30cc-8001-94c7-7d2853931a25
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== How to overcome it (without gaslighting yourself) ===== You don’t need to “power through.” That often backfires. You need to restructure the input. ====== 1. Force semantic expansion before symbol parsing ====== Before touching the formula, ask: * What kind of thing is this? Bound? Definition? Property? * What is varying? What is fixed? * What is the informal claim? For the first formula, the informal version is something like: : “The outer measure of a union is at least what inclusion–exclusion would give you, if you apply it to outer measures of intersections.” Once you have that, the symbols stop being noise. ====== 2. Rewrite aggressively (on paper) ====== Literally rewrite: * Replace ∑ with “sum over” * Replace index sets with explicit cases for small nnn * Expand for n=2n = 2n=2 or 333 Your brain wants examples before generality. Give it that. ====== 3. Delay reverence for notation ====== Textbooks often treat notation as sacred. Don’t. Rewrite it in your notation. Invent helper symbols. Break one line into five. Mathematicians do this constantly off the page. The published form is optimized for storage, not cognition. ====== 4. Read proofs backwards ====== Start from: * “What is this supposed to establish?” * “What would have to be true for this inequality to hold?” Then work backward. This restores intentionality.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)