Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69286bee-aafc-8011-ac5f-9fd90198a0a4
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4. Practical takeaways for WFH & IT teams ==== For employees / WFH folks in MI or WI: * You don’t need to change your work VPN setup today. * The Michigan bill, if revived and passed without carve‑outs, is the one that could truly break WFH inside the state. * The Wisconsin bill is mostly about porn sites + VPNs, not day‑to‑day work connectivity. For corporate / IT / security teams: * Keep an eye on HB 4938 in Michigan and AB 105 / SB 130 in Wisconsin: - If you have offices or a large workforce in those states, your legal/compliance team will probably want to track amendments and court challenges. * Consider: - Having non‑VPN fallback options (e.g., app‑level HTTPS access) just in case something weird happens at the ISP level. - Making sure internal acceptable‑use policies already forbid employees from using corporate VPN egress to access adult content – that can help distance corporate traffic from the content these bills are targeting. * This is general information, not legal advice. For decisions that affect your company’s risk posture, talk to counsel or external experts who follow state telecom / First Amendment litigation. If you tell me whether you’re asking as an individual remote worker or as someone responsible for corporate IT/policy, I can sketch a more specific “what to do if X passes” contingency plan for you. Further reading on these VPN‑ban proposalsTechRadarVPN usage at risk in Michigan under new proposed adult content law17 de set. de 2025<ref>{{cite web|title=TechRadarVPN usage at risk in Michigan under new proposed adult content law17 de set. de 2025|url=https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/vpn-usage-at-risk-in-michigan-under-new-proposed-adult-content-law|publisher=TechRadarVPN usage at risk in Michigan under new proposed adult content law17 de set. de 2025|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>TechRadarAge verification lands in Italy − here's how it affects VPN usershá 14 dias<ref>{{cite web|title=TechRadarAge verification lands in Italy − here's how it affects VPN usershá 14 dias|url=https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/age-verification-lands-in-italy-heres-how-it-affects-vpn-users|publisher=TechRadarAge verification lands in Italy − here's how it affects VPN usershá 14 dias|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)