Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/686aedb2-60b0-8003-98a8-e1766cf496a6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Support for his stance ===== * Better pre-biotic syntheses. Sutherland’s team has now extended one-pot routes to both purine and pyrimidine ribonucleotides and to lipid–RNA co-synthesis, mitigating the “too complex” objection. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov<ref>{{cite web|title=pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov|url=https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10351881/|publisher=pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> * Non-enzymatic replication strides. 2024 modelling and bench work from the Szostak and Georgia Tech groups show template copying of 4-base mixed sequences assisted by activated oligonucleotides and “NERPE” primer-extension platforms, directly attacking the fidelity problem Bernhardt flagged. biorxiv.org<ref>{{cite web|title=biorxiv.org|url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.17.603910v1.full.pdf|publisher=biorxiv.org|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref>ssdl.gatech.edu<ref>{{cite web|title=ssdl.gatech.edu|url=https://ssdl.gatech.edu/2024/01/31/nerpe-non-enzymatic-rna-primer-extension/|publisher=ssdl.gatech.edu|date=2024-01-31|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> * Nucleotide-bias overcome. A 2025 NAR paper reports near-uniform copying yields for A- and U-rich templates by tweaking leaving groups – progress Bernhardt predicted was possible. academic.oup.com<ref>{{cite web|title=academic.oup.com|url=https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/52/22/13515/7893325|publisher=academic.oup.com|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> Challenges / new wrinkles * RNA-peptide world. Experiments generating peptide-decorated RNA chimeras under plausible pre-biotic conditions suggest a hybrid stage, partly vindicating “co-evolution” advocates and softening Bernhardt’s dismissal of peptides-first. nature.com<ref>{{cite web|title=nature.com|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04676-3|publisher=nature.com|access-date=2025-11-16}}</ref> * Proteins-first phylogenetics continues. Caetano-Anollés’ camp keeps publishing protein-centric trees; they have not disproved RNA-first, but the debate has broadened rather than closed. Overall, none of the post-2012 data decisively overturn Bernhardt’s critiques; most reinforce his view that RNA-world weaknesses are being eroded experimentally.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)