Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/67fe07f5-ee00-800f-83e4-9849c46b2000
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4. Draft Final Chapter for the Novel Book ==== Below is a draft of the final chapter for your updated book, “Geo-societal Narratives,” which synthesizes the above analyses and updates. ===== Final Chapter: Reconfiguring Geoethics in the Anthropocene ===== ====== Abstract ====== This chapter reconfigures geoethics for the contemporary epoch by transcending traditional binaries and integrating diverse epistemological, normative, and participatory perspectives. Building on earlier reflections, it advances a research agenda for the development of epistemic-moral hybrids and calls for an inclusive, transdisciplinary framework that reconciles Earth system science with societal imperatives. In doing so, it addresses the evolving challenges of anthropogenic change, digital transformation, and the reimagining of ethical praxis in a planetary context. ====== Introduction ====== The discipline of geoethics has undergone significant transformations over the past decade. Early formulations, which positioned ethical debates in geosciences within a dichotomy of “humans versus nature,” no longer suffice in the face of complex, planetary-scale challenges. This chapter revisits the foundational perspectives presented in earlier works while articulating an updated framework that accommodates new epistemic and normative insights. It outlines a forward-looking research programme that integrates alternative epistemologies, transcends anthropocentric limitations, and reimagines the interfaces between scientific practice, societal governance, and ethical responsibility. ====== 1. Revisiting Traditional Narratives in Geoethics ====== Early geo-societal narratives emphasized the need for “value-neutral” approaches in geosciences. However, such frameworks have increasingly been critiqued for their inability to account for the normative dimensions inherent in Earth system research. This chapter begins by revisiting these narratives and critically assessing their limitations. In doing so, we confront the persistent binary of human versus non-human, which has constrained our understanding of the ethical implications of scientific practice. ====== 2. Beyond Binary Thinking: From Anthropocentrism to Relational Ethics ====== A core theme of this updated discourse is the reconceptualization of anthropocentrism. Drawing on recent debates—ranging from discussions on “Surface Bias” to the emergent “Animistic Sensibilities”—this section outlines the shift towards a relational ethics. Here, natural entities are no longer seen solely as passive objects in the realm of human dominance but are recognized as actors with intrinsic values. This paradigm shift is essential for reconciling geoethical discourses with legal, cultural, and ecological imperatives. ====== 3. Epistemic-Moral Hybrids and the Integration of Alternative Epistemologies ====== The evolution of geoethics requires the acknowledgement of epistemic-moral hybrids—innovative approaches that merge scientific inquiry with ethical reflexivity. In this section, we discuss the importance of interdisciplinary dialogue and epistemic trespassing. By incorporating alternative epistemologies that include indigenous, non-Western, and decolonial perspectives, we advocate for a more inclusive and robust framework for knowledge production. This integration not only challenges the confines of conventional science but also emphasizes the co-production of knowledge among diverse stakeholders. ====== 4. Inclusive Governance and Participatory Approaches in the Anthropocene ====== Modern challenges demand governance models that are as inclusive as they are innovative. This section examines contemporary proposals for participatory decision-making and integrative dialogue frameworks that bridge the gap between scientific expertise and public engagement. We review contemporary case studies that illustrate how co-design and co-production can lead to more resilient and ethically sound policies. In doing so, we also highlight the need for an educational revolution that equips future generations with the skills and ethical awareness required to navigate complex, interconnected systems. ====== 5. Confronting Contemporary Challenges: Digitalisation, Earth Observation, and the Planetary Crisis ====== Technological advancements—particularly in digitalisation and Earth observation—have transformed the landscape of geo-societal research. This section updates earlier perspectives by addressing how new technology classes (e.g., artificial intelligence, robotics, and remote sensing) are reconfiguring our interactions with the Earth. Here, we explore the dual-use dilemmas of modern research and the necessity for ethical self-awareness in the face of rapidly evolving scientific methods. These challenges underscore the urgency of developing post-normal science approaches that are both reflective and adaptive. ====== 6. Towards a Future Research Agenda ====== In conclusion, this chapter outlines a comprehensive research agenda aimed at fostering methodological innovation and ethical accountability. The proposed agenda includes: * The establishment of interdisciplinary consortia to explore epistemic-moral hybrids. * The creation of participatory platforms for integrating diverse knowledge systems into policy-making. * The development of new pedagogical models that emphasize supradisciplinary learning and reflexive inquiry. * The design of ethical oversight frameworks that facilitate responsible research and proactive risk governance in the geosciences. ====== Conclusion ====== This updated final chapter seeks to transform geoethics by reconciling traditional scientific narratives with emergent, integrative approaches. By challenging entrenched binaries and embracing the complexities of contemporary geo-societal dynamics, it paves the way for a more inclusive, reflective, and responsive practice of geoscience. In an era defined by planetary-scale anthropogenic change, such an approach is not merely desirable but imperative for ensuring that the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge are both ethically grounded and socially relevant. This draft represents a comprehensive update that integrates the foundational concerns of your earlier work with the enriched agenda provided by the current topic index. It is intended to serve both as a synthesis of past insights and as a forward-looking manifesto for future research in geo-societal narratives.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)