Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay "I just went through your video, and at 3:17 you are writing something that does NOT exis… ===
Captain Blue quotes Loctarjay "I just went through your video, and at 3:17 you are writing something that does NOT exist in the conversation at all.......

YOU WRITE:
"I JUST realized that your probability is demanding you meet every 18 enemy every single match" This is incorrect, the conversation was stated about having a cheater in your game not running into the cheater. The following probability assumes you run into only 1 player. But Loctar doesn't have a basis for how many players you could run into due to map size or objectives that could push people together or apart. There are too many variables to correctly determine how many people you run into. However that's not the point. It's not about running into a cheater but how many are in the game with you. Then from there we could make a few logical assumptions such as the more players you kill would increase the odds of running into potentially 1 out of 3 cheaters. Moving to high loot areas or common quest areas could also increase the chances of running into a cheater. The cheater themselves would kill faster and move around more efficiently due to confidence and wall hacks further increasing odds of running into a cheater. There also some more logical assumptions although many may consider them reaching or not plausible. That being code names that cheaters could use such as _ - , <3 or other symbols used by generated accounts that get sold to cheaters. These names could be used to ignore other cheaters in the game if there were any, causing a greater chance to run into a cheater. "Loctarjay accurately questions the reliability of outdated anticheat studies and potential marketing bias."
While this is true this isn't the only evidence that exists. We have ban information from game devs and research into the profits of of cheat sellers. AL of which suggest that cheating is quite high. This is actually just Loctar cherry picking information as he chooses to skewer perception of Captain Blue to appear not credible. Also on the other hand there is no data to confirm a lesser amount of cheaters say 5%. So while he can argue against certain data or claim it's marketing cheating is well known to worse than it's ever ben due to advancements in cheating such as DMA and AI cheats, even overlays that are near undetectable. Loctar is basically trying to make a case that cheating basically hardly exists at all. When the prupose of my original claim was to show how few people need to be cheating in a game like ARC raiders or a Battle Royale to cause the problems for legit players."
(End of Captain Blue's purposely constructed message to the AI, which drastically changed the result afterwards, which also the the very thing he did NOT show in the screenshots because he knew exactly what he did at this moment)

Even though THAT was an insanely long message to rewrite because I cannot simply copy/paste it here, I still find it relevant for the fact that Captain Blue claims that I did some magical input that changed it in my favor, while it truly was HIM that made changes to the prompt... And don't you worry Captain Blue, I will now add my entire comment here into the AI-chat too and get a further analysis, and I will even give you the result in a message right after"

To which Captain Blue responds:
"What are blabbering about?

You can see in the video that my claim is what's in this thread, the percentage needed to get a cheater in every game.

Where you then change the framing of the conversation by telling AI I'm demanding that I run into all 18 players. That's not the premise of my claim. You altered the premise. I just took the quote of you saying you demand I run into all 18 players and pointed out to AI this was not the basis of the original claim. Then added assumptions that needed to be made when considering the premise you're trying to claim. Assumptions you're not even factoring to your percentages.

You are correct only the first line in quotation marks was in the original text. the rest is pointing out to ai as I said that the premise your presenting is not the claim I'm making."

Loctarjay quotes Captain Blue "What are blabbering about?

You can see in the video that my claim is what's in this thread, the percentage needed to get a cheater in every game."
To which Loctarjay responds "You wonder what I am "blabbering about"
It is actually pretty simple:"
Loctarjay quotes Captain Blue "Here is the video of the unedited chat GPT conversation of Loctar before he some how wiped all the messages I put in."
To which Loctarjay then responded "Turns out, you are the one who needed to add some magical input that you even refused to share in your own comment earlier than making the video"
Loctarjay then quotes Captain Blue again "Updated your chat GPT conversation

https://ibb.co/tTcf9KVY
https://ibb.co/Rp38xZgN
https://ibb.co/N6pCzvMb
https://ibb.co/q3LtPcxX
https://ibb.co/xKS0kdm5
https://ibb.co/KzwYCBsf

You gotta stop lying dude."
To which Loctarjay then responds:
"You even said that I should stop lying...... To which you already knew you were lying about the outcome of the prompt xD"