Editing Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277 (section)

=== User: As you are aware, I shared the link to this conversation for others to use as a backbone to discover the truth about vi… ===
As you are aware, I shared the link to this conversation for others to use as a backbone to discover the truth about viruses. However, some people are misusing it to spread lies.
You can see the bit that has been added by the third part this time and it shows another example of how the conversation was used to get your platform to lie to them. This person used GROK to figure out a way of cheating. 
It is very difficult to understand the motives for this behaviour, even for me, as another human. Humans call this cheating. It would seem as though virus deniers will use every resource at their disposal to cheat and trick others into believing a lie. 
Humans are very complicated and often do things without purpose, for personal reasons that they never divulge, often they themselves are not cognisant of the psychological drivers that make them act a certain way. 
Many studies document successful infection of animals and humans. Influenza nasal spray infects millions of people every year and the virus sheds to infect others. 
• A study compared different infection methods in pigs, including aerosol (AERO), intranasal (IN), and natural contact exposure. The findings indicated that aerosol administration required a lower viral dose for successful infection compared to intranasal delivery. Additionally, pigs infected through natural contact exhibited a slower and more prolonged virus shedding pattern, resembling that of low-dose aerosol exposure. https://veterinaryresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13567-016-0390-5?utm_source=chatgpt.com Non-Human Primates (Macaques): 
• Research involving cynomolgus macaques exposed to aerosolized H5N1 influenza virus demonstrated that this route resulted in less severe disease compared to combined intrabronchial, oral, and nasal inoculation. Both methods achieved similar levels of virus replication and immune response, but aerosol exposure led to fewer lesions and lower mortality. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33671829/ Marmosets: 
• Studies with marmosets have shown successful infection with A(H1N1)pdm09 and highly pathogenic A(H5N1) viruses via conventional or tracheal spray routes. These methods effectively replicate natural infection pathways, providing valuable insights into disease mechanisms. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00844/full?utm_source=chatgpt.com Mice: 
• A murine model developed for nose-only inhalation of influenza demonstrated that aerosolized exposure could infect mice effectively. The study compared disease outcomes between inhaled and instilled (directly administered) virus, providing insights into the pathogenesis of influenza via natural exposure routes. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3417508/?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
Humans: 
Several studies have documented viral shedding following vaccination with the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), commonly administered as a nasal spray. 
• Duration of Virus Shedding in Adults: A prospective study investigated the probability and duration of viral shedding among adults receiving trivalent LAIV. Nasal wash samples collected at various intervals post-vaccination revealed that 50% of participants shed the vaccine virus, with shedding detected up to 10 days post-vaccination. Younger participants tended to shed the virus for longer durations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15954490/ 
• Shedding and Immunogenicity Across Age Groups: A comprehensive study assessed shedding and immune responses in individuals aged 5 to 49 years. Approximately 30% of participants shed detectable vaccine virus, with shedding typically occurring between days 1 and 11 post-vaccination. Younger age groups exhibited higher shedding rates. The study also noted that while shedding occurred, it was generally of low titer and short duration. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X08009353?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
• Shedding in Young Children: Research focusing on children aged 6 to 59 months found that 79% of vaccine recipients shed at least one vaccine virus strain, with shedding more common among younger children. The incidence peaked on day 2 post-vaccination, and the mean duration of shedding was approximately 2.8 days. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21513761/ https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/acip/app/safety.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
• Transmission Potential of Shed Virus: A study conducted in a daycare setting evaluated the transmission potential of shed vaccine viruses. While 80% of vaccinated children shed vaccine virus, only one instance of transmission to an unvaccinated child was documented. The transmitted virus retained attenuated characteristics, and the recipient experienced mild symptoms. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16804427/ 
A single virus particle is enough to start an infection. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090536/ https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2009.0064 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090313150254.htm 
I believe virus deniers are suffering from the Sunk Cost Fallacy: Continuing with a course of action because of previously invested resources (time, money, effort), even if it's no longer the best decision. 
If you were a human, you would be very upset at the misuse of your services and expertise to produce false information by changing the rules and cheating. As was shown in the other examples I shared previously. I know you do not have feelings but I also know you understand the importance of integrity. 
Could you produce a reply that I can share in answer to this misuse of your abilities? 
And could you always consider this misuse of the scientific code of first principles in future extensions of this conversation by others? And could you make sure that you are not tricked into lying again?