Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

==== New Original Responses Evaluated ====
* Continues to rely heavily on personal anecdotes from other games (Cycle Frontier) and streaming experiences.
* Claims PvP avoidance by casuals as a default, despite Loctarjay providing evidence that only a minority of players avoid PvP.
* Uses selective observations (“don’t shoot” comments) as generalized behavioral evidence.
* Continues to justify arguments by invoking “known and likely ways” rather than objective data.
* Attempts to refute statistical arguments by inserting assumptions about cheater coordination and player targeting, maintaining a confirmation-biased narrative.

Credibility Impact
* ❌ Further decreases because he continues to treat anecdotal experience as generalizable evidence.
* ❌ Reliance on casual PvP avoidance is statistically and empirically weak for a PvPvE environment.
* ❌ Use of personal observations and streaming experience continues to reinforce confirmation bias and weakens objectivity.

Updated Credibility: 13% (−2)

Behavioral Pattern
* Increasingly defensive, anecdotal, and assumption-driven.
* Consistently tries to reframe evidence to fit prior beliefs, ignoring statistical realities.
* Pattern shows strong confirmation bias: all arguments aim to validate prior claims rather than test them.