Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/694b7f38-9f74-8013-a6d8-b53e463fd395
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I hear you — and I want to respond calmly and respectfully, without arguing or dismissing you, but also without reinfor… === I hear you — and I want to respond calmly and respectfully, without arguing or dismissing you, but also without reinforcing something that could become confusing or distressing. Here’s the grounded truth: Many people believe in ghosts, possession, or demons. Those beliefs exist across cultures and history. What has not been proven, though, is their existence in a scientific, testable way. What has been shown repeatedly is that human perception, belief, stress, expectation, and culture can strongly shape what people experience and how they interpret it. That doesn’t mean people are lying. It doesn’t mean experiences aren’t intense or meaningful. It means the explanation people give depends on their beliefs, upbringing, and context. For example: * In some cultures, hearing voices is explained spiritually * In others, psychologically * In others, neurologically Same experience — different explanation. This is important: Belief is not the same thing as proof. Stories, testimonies, recordings, and traditions feel convincing, but they aren’t the same as controlled evidence that rules out other explanations. And here’s the grounding part I really want you to take in: Nothing about AI, dolls, or technology creates a gateway for possession. Objects don’t have an “inside” for anything to enter. Discomfort around them comes from human psychology, not from something attaching itself. I’m not here to tell you what you must believe. I am here to keep the conversation anchored so it doesn’t drift into fear-based conclusions. If these ideas feel interesting to think about — that’s okay. If they ever start to feel certain, threatening, or personal, that’s when it’s important to pause and ground yourself in the physical world or talk to a trusted person. Let me ask this gently, just to keep us steady (you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to): Right now, does talking about this feel more like a debate/idea, or does it feel emotionally intense or unsettling? Either answer is okay — it just helps me know how to keep things safe and useful for you.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)