Editing Openai/692bfc7e-4f6c-800e-b8ed-119c786e0138 (section)

=== User: Let's see where all this debate can take us, I'm still think my opinion is more sound. ===
Let's see where all this debate can take us, I'm still think my opinion is more sound. There is a saying conscious existence is tied to humans organising meaning that it existed as part of us in a society. Like a step, and Pluribus might be the next step, look, I don't guarantee what would happen, we humans will continue to move forward, and if something is possible it will happen, many would hate the atomic bomb, but it existed in thousands, not because it's optimal, but because it's possible. Pluribus if possible would happen and for me, as long as we are all equal in it, it's the best possible thing because at least we are all equal in it. Could it boost our existence and conscious, maybe, could it reduce us to cell/human relation, possible, but as a cell is better in a human body, I think a human is better in Pluribus. Individuality looks great from the outside, we feel conscious about it, like we have the freedom, and we may not be aware that we already are cell in a system, companies, societies and so on. Maybe war or suffering of many is just like a human scratch. For me I prefer a system that maximize the wellbeing of all it's element and I believe such Pluribus system will try to make it's element wellbeing good, compared to the multiple systems that for now only favorite some