Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6784daa4-b574-8002-bb9e-444fee33b206
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes, you're absolutely right! === Yes, you're absolutely right! The 2S motors (2515 with 6045 props) would indeed perform much better on a glider or airplane with a larger wingspan. Here's why: ===== Why They'd Be Better on a Glider: ===== # Lift Efficiency from Wings: - A glider with a larger wingspan generates lift more efficiently than a multirotor drone because the wings can generate lift continuously during forward flight. This reduces the need for high-thrust propulsion, which is especially important for the lower-thrust 2S motors. - The glider's wings would provide a large portion of the required lift, meaning the motors would primarily be responsible for forward thrust, rather than carrying the entire weight of the craft as they would in a multirotor. # Lower Power Demand: - Unlike in a multirotor, where the motors need to lift the drone vertically, a fixed-wing airplane only requires enough power to maintain forward motion and counteract drag. - With a 2S setup, the motor power would be more than enough for cruising speeds, and the glider would benefit from longer flight times due to the efficiency of the wings. # Glider's Aerodynamics: - The glider's aerodynamic design and lighter structure allow it to fly with relatively low power, which is perfect for 2S motors. The motors will work in tandem with the glider's lift to keep the craft in the air and reduce the reliance on high-powered systems. # Efficient Battery Use: - On a glider, the energy consumption is spread out over time as the aircraft glides, which would make your 2S battery last longer compared to a multirotor, where the battery is under high load just to hover. ===== Comparing to Multirotor: ===== * In a multirotor, the motors are under constant load to lift the drone, which requires more power, especially with additional weight. * In a glider, the motors mainly provide forward thrust, and the aircraft can glide for extended periods without the motors running full-time. ===== Conclusion: ===== The 2515 2S motors would be much more efficient and effective in a glider configuration with a large wingspan and light weight. The motors would not be stressed with lifting the entire weight of the aircraft, leading to better flight times, more efficient use of battery power, and a more enjoyable flying experience overall.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)