Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695291d1-4c70-800f-a08c-c27ed48ff7bc
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Patterns and Interpretation ===== Tyler Cowen’s view (majority of commentary): * Cautious/critical realism — he sees potential value in reform ideas underlying DOGE but repeatedly emphasizes institutional ambiguity, lack of a clear governance model, limited political constituency, and risks of over-centralization. His tone moves from interest in what could work toward skepticism as real-world implementation struggles. Marginal REVOLUTION<ref>{{cite web|title=Marginal REVOLUTION|url=https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2024/11/how-to-make-doge-work.html|publisher=Marginal REVOLUTION|access-date=2025-12-29}}</ref> Alex Tabarrok’s involvement: * Less directly about DOGE; his Sunstein on DOGE hosted ideas relevant to government efficiency and a brief Sentence of the Day allusion, rather than clear endorsements or critiques. Marginal REVOLUTION<ref>{{cite web|title=Marginal REVOLUTION|url=https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2024/11/sunstein-on-doge.html|publisher=Marginal REVOLUTION|access-date=2025-12-29}}</ref> If you’d like, I can compile direct excerpts from these posts into a side-by-side comparison or extract critical passages for deeper qualitative analysis.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)