Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6928dffa-2c40-800e-b585-2520d50a2cbb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Key specs & performance comparisons (typical ranges / manufacturer claims) === * Setting & cure time - Foam: initial set often 3β30 minutes; final cure often within 1β2 hours (product dependent). You can usually start building much faster than with concrete. Sika USA<ref>{{cite web|title=Sika USA|url=https://usa.sika.com/retail/en/products-catalog/post-setting/sika-postfix.html|publisher=Sika USA|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> - Concrete: initial set hours (can be walkable in 24 hrs for small mixes), full strength in days; you typically wait 24β48+ hours before loading heavily. Bob Vila<ref>{{cite web|title=Bob Vila|url=https://www.bobvila.com/articles/expanding-foam-vs-concrete-fence-post/|publisher=Bob Vila|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> * Compressive / lateral performance - Foam manufacturers often compare their product to tamped soil (foam sometimes claims 3β4Γ the compressive strength of tamped soil and lateral resistance figures like βresists >500 lb lateral forceβ for certain fence products). These are useful for comparing against soil, not necessarily against cured concrete. Fast 2K<ref>{{cite web|title=Fast 2K|url=https://fast2k.com/|publisher=Fast 2K|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> - Concrete (properly mixed and cured) generally provides much greater mass, stiffness and long-term compressive strength than generic post-foam β and concrete footings distribute loads into the ground more predictably for heavy or structural loads. Bob Vila<ref>{{cite web|title=Bob Vila|url=https://www.bobvila.com/articles/expanding-foam-vs-concrete-fence-post/|publisher=Bob Vila|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> * Weight & excavation - Foam: very lightweight (one bag expands and fills many cubic feet), easier to handle, no heavy wheelbarrows. Sika USA<ref>{{cite web|title=Sika USA|url=https://usa.sika.com/retail/en/products-catalog/post-setting/sika-postfix.html|publisher=Sika USA|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> - Concrete: heavy, permanent mass β good where mass and rigidity are required. Bob Vila<ref>{{cite web|title=Bob Vila|url=https://www.bobvila.com/articles/expanding-foam-vs-concrete-fence-post/|publisher=Bob Vila|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref> * Code & approvals - Some foam products (e.g., certain Fast2K items) carry ICC-ES or IBC/IRC guidance for specific load-bearing deck anchors; others (Sika PostFix) explicitly say not recommended for structural applications like decks/playground/basketball poles. Always match the product PDS to the intended use and check local code. Fast 2K<ref>{{cite web|title=Fast 2K|url=https://fast2k.com/|publisher=Fast 2K|access-date=2025-11-28}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)