Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69256b37-1cac-8004-bb0d-12fcbb764b89
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== Putting it together in your own vocabulary: ===== * The LinkedIn-type forecast is truth-map extrapolation: extend curves on a graph. * Bridge360 is Hamilton–Jacobi-style navigation: - track the entropy eigenvector, - monitor F for each governance template (EU, US, China, India, etc.), - and ask which systems can keep navigation inside the ε-band without hitting catastrophic attractors. Under that lens: # Europe shaping 2100 - Likely as a low-autocracy, high-noise but entropy-bounded block, if it avoids sliding into its own authoritarian attractors. # China shaping 2100 - Likely to shape the trajectory, but - whether it is a dominant, stable economic pole in 2100 or the source of one or more systemic crises before that depends on whether the Politburo’s autocracy level comes down enough to reduce F. # Bridge360 verdict on the forecast - Acceptable as a scenario, but incomplete: - It says who is big, - Bridge360 asks how they stay big without tearing the fabric of the global system. - So you can rewrite the line (Bridge360-compliant) as something like: > If you’d like, we can next turn that into a 2–3 sentence quote you can drop directly into LinkedIn as a reply to that 2100 forecast.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)