Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6920370e-af50-8007-985e-1645172973a6
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 方向 1:強化憲政制衡的紅線 ===== 主張:立法院或政府不得制定/修正法律,削弱司法、憲法法庭、監察機關或其他制衡體系之獨立性。 為什麼能反制:你提到藍白正透過修法(如憲訴法、選罷法、財劃法)侵蝕監察、司法、財政分權等機制。中央社 CNA<ref>{{cite web|title=中央社 CNA|url=https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202412210005.aspx|publisher=中央社 CNA|access-date=2025-11-22}}</ref> 公投可以將「憲政制衡」作為全民紅線。 可能的主文範例:「你是否同意:若立法院通過之法律,明確削弱司法院、監察院、憲法法庭或地方自主財政分權(須明確定義),則該修法案應提交全民複決?」 補充條件:需界定什麼為「削弱」/「削除」制衡機制(如:降低司法獨立門檻、取消監察院彈劾權、中央收回地方財政自主),避免提案過模糊。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)