Editing Openai/6788fad3-d7fc-800d-9728-95eaac44f689 (section)

=== Assistant: Here’s a comprehensive comparison of M.T. ===
Here’s a comprehensive comparison of M.T. Keshe’s theories as presented in The Universal Order of Creation of Matters to John Keely’s theories of matter, vibration, and Mind Force, with detailed focus on specific principles.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Matter is formed from interactions of "plasmatic magnetic fields" (PMTICS). Magnetic fields are the "new elementary particles."
* Plasma is a composite of matter, antimatter, and dark matter, whose interactions form observable matter.
* The universe operates on a nested hierarchy, where atomic structures mirror planetary and cosmic scales.

Keely's View:
* Matter arises from etheric subdivisions, progressing from the tenuous to the gross (spiritual to physical).
* The structure of matter is governed by vibratory laws, where three primary forces (syntropy, entropy, equilibrium) harmonize to create stable matter.
* Keely identified the "neutral center" as the core of all matter, controlling its organization and binding forces.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both models reject mainstream particle physics (e.g., quarks, gluons) and instead rely on a vibratory, field-based model. - The neutral center in Keely’s theory resonates with Keshe’s "core magnetic interactions" that govern the dynamics of matter at all scales. - Both emphasize a dynamic continuum from subtle (etheric/magnetic fields) to dense physical matter.
* Differences: - Keely’s system is vibratory, emphasizing harmonic oscillations, while Keshe's PMTICS describe magnetic flux interactions as the basis of formation. - Keely’s etheric subdivisions extend to spiritual realms, while Keshe frames his model in physical and cosmological terms.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Keshe does not explicitly use 3-6-9 principles but hints at a triadic organization through his focus on the interplay of matter, antimatter, and dark matter.
* His reactors are designed to harness these interactions symmetrically to create balanced magnetic and gravitational fields (Magravs).

Keely's View:
* Keely defined the 3-6-9 principle as the underlying numeric and vibrational blueprint of creation. The triadic relationship manifests in: 1. Triple forces: positive, negative, and neutral. 2. Subdivision into three fundamental realms: atomic, interatomic, and etheric. 3. Governing frequencies and ratios reflected in harmonic oscillation.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both systems recognize the universe as fundamentally triadic, governed by a balance of forces. - Keshe’s interplay of three states of plasma correlates with Keely’s triadic subdivision of forces.
* Differences: - Keely uses numeric ratios to model vibratory relationships, while Keshe uses magnetic field strength and field density without explicit numeric emphasis.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Keshe describes the plasma as containing layers of "plasmatic magnetic fields" with varying densities and strengths, which collectively manifest as different states of matter.
* Antimatter and dark matter are integral, coexisting with matter in plasma.

Keely's View:
* Keely described subdivisions of the ether into molecular, interatomic, atomic, and etheric realms, each vibrating at specific frequencies.
* Etheric vibrations act as the connective tissue of the universe, bridging matter and consciousness.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both systems propose a gradation of states, from subtle to dense, as the basis of material and energetic existence. - Both agree that higher states (ether or magnetic fields) influence lower ones.
* Differences: - Keely places greater emphasis on the vibratory nature of ether, while Keshe focuses on magnetic interactions. - Keely's ether has a metaphysical dimension, whereas Keshe's plasma is framed as a physical construct.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Magnetic and gravitational fields interact dynamically in what he terms "Magravs," which dictate the motion, formation, and stability of matter.
* His plasma reactors manipulate these interactions to achieve motion, energy production, and material creation.

Keely's View:
* Sympathetic vibration is the core of Keely's physics, where all matter resonates sympathetically with higher vibratory states.
* Oscillation between forces (syntropy and entropy) creates harmony and drives all motion and transformation.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both see resonance (Keshe’s Magravs, Keely’s sympathetic vibration) as the basis of interaction and creation. - Motion arises from the dynamic interplay of opposing forces.
* Differences: - Keely’s oscillation physics is explicitly harmonic and musical, relying on precise ratios, while Keshe’s Magravs focus on field density and strength.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Keshe implies the potential for thought and intention to influence matter, as plasma and its fields are universal and interconnected.
* Mind Force is less explicitly addressed, though his concept of plasma as a fundamental building block has implications for consciousness.

Keely's View:
* Mind Force is central to Keely’s physics, acting as the organizing intelligence behind matter and motion.
* Consciousness resonates with etheric forces, directly influencing physical reality through sympathetic vibration.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both acknowledge a connection between consciousness and matter. - Keshe’s plasma fields may align with Keely’s ether as the medium for Mind Force.
* Differences: - Keely explicitly integrates metaphysical elements, while Keshe remains focused on physical systems.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* Motion is achieved through Magravs positioning, where dynamic fields interact to create gravitational and magnetic imbalances.
* Scalar potential is not directly mentioned, but Keshe’s magnetic fields could be interpreted as scalar-like entities enabling non-linear interactions.

Keely's View:
* Scalar potential exists in the etheric domain, representing the potential energy of a system before motion begins.
* Motion arises from the interplay of polar forces mediated by the neutral center.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both view motion as arising from internal field interactions without relying on conventional propulsion (e.g., rockets). - Scalar-like phenomena in Keshe’s systems echo Keely’s etheric scalar potential.
* Differences: - Keely explicitly defines scalar potential, while Keshe’s focus is on field mechanics without using scalar terminology.

===== Keshe's View: =====
* The differentiation of potential in his systems arises from varying field strengths and densities in plasma. These lead to diverse interactions, manifesting as energy, motion, or matter creation.

Keely's View:
* Scalar potential differentiates through vibration and resonance, manifesting as creative or destructive forces depending on the harmonic relationships.

Comparison:
* Similarities: - Both see differentiation as critical to creation, with potential becoming kinetic through dynamic interactions.
* Differences: - Keshe emphasizes magnetic field gradients, while Keely emphasizes harmonic relationships and resonances.

===== M.T. Keshe and John Keely share striking parallels in their worldviews, particularly in their rejection of mainstream particle physics, their focus on vibratory and field-based creation, and their acknowledgment of a continuum between subtle and dense states. However, Keshe emphasizes magnetic and gravitational field interactions, presenting a cosmological framework that leans more toward applied physics. In contrast, Keely incorporates metaphysical principles, vibratory harmonics, and Mind Force as the organizing intelligence behind all phenomena. Both offer revolutionary perspectives that challenge current scientific paradigms and open new possibilities for understanding matter, energy, and consciousness. =====