Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69332b84-224c-800b-9fb8-ed5094be90c5
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 你問的問題沒有簡單答案,但目前科學推得出最合理的結論是: === ==== 它可能只是:** ==== # 技術還沒到(最常見) # 宇宙禁止(主流科學) # 時間線不包含這個事件 # 多重宇宙把訊息送到其他分支去了 # 未來還沒進行那個行為 # 訊號被壓成我們難以察覺的形式 換句話說: : 如果你願意,我可以更深入分析: * 權威物理學家對「時間旅行與訊息」的立場 * 多世界 vs Block Universe 哪個比較可能 * 一個故事示例:如果未來傳訊來會是什麼樣 你想往哪個方向聊?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)