Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68fceef0-7248-8013-bf5d-581461dec5bc
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Great adds. === Great adds. Here’s how we’ll handle both—without bloating scope. ==== We can’t get an absolute speed from weights alone (that’d need masses/inertia/damping). So we’ll add one optional driver input and compute the rest: ==== * Driver input (choose one): - Pinion RPM (shaft speed), or - Line speed at the drum (in/s), or - Measured rack speed (in/s) * We output (results-only on page): - Rack speed for both pinions (in/s) — same value because r_d = r_p - Time to end for each arm = L / rack speed Notes: With our default rule r_d = r_p, the kinematic ratio is 1:1 (line speed = rack speed). If the ratio changes later, the calculator already supports it. ==== We’ll report an Effective Mechanical Advantage (EMA) that folds in your simple losses and projection effects: ==== * Net driving weight = Wp−Ws−Wasm/4W_p - W_s - W_{asm}/4Wp−Ws−Wasm/4 * Projection/angle factor = (1 − Overall Angle Loss %) * Running efficiency factor = ηtop×ηbot=0.992\eta_{top} \times \eta_{bot} = 0.99^2ηtop×ηbot=0.992 * With r_d = r_p, the kinematic force ratio is 1:1. Outputs shown: * EMA (number): EMA=ηtotal×Projection factor\text{EMA} = \eta_{\text{total}} \times \text{Projection factor}EMA=ηtotal×Projection factor (e.g., if angles give 30% loss and η_total=0.9801 → EMA ≈ 0.686) * Effective rack force (lbf): Frack=EMA×(Wp−Ws−Wasm/4)F_{\text{rack}} = \text{EMA} \times (W_p - W_s - W_{asm}/4)Frack=EMA×(Wp−Ws−Wasm/4) * Equivalent effective weights (for intuition): - Primary → rack: Wp×EMAW_p \times \text{EMA}Wp×EMA - Secondary → opposing at rack: Ws×EMAW_s \times \text{EMA}Ws×EMA - Assembly quarter-weight → opposing at rack: (Wasm/4)×EMA(W_{asm}/4) \times \text{EMA}(Wasm/4)×EMA We’ll also keep your existing static breakaway check: we compare the available shaft torque (from the net driving weight with the above factors applied) to the auto τs of both pinions. ==== - Add Driver input (optional): Pinion RPM or Line speed or Measured rack speed (blank by default). ==== * Add Speed outputs: Rack speed (in/s) and Time to end (s) per arm. * Add EMA block with the three effective weights and FrackF_{\text{rack}}Frack. If that matches what you want, say OK and I’ll mark these as locked.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)