Editing Openai/6969614e-00e4-8001-ac42-dda7410c3c4a (section)

=== Assistant: Below are the sentences in the summary that are in tension with each other, plus a brief note on why they conflict. ===
Below are the sentences in the summary that are in tension with each other, plus a brief note on why they conflict. I am not adding new claims—only identifying conflicts already present.

===== Sentence A (discouraging): =====

: 

Sentence B (implicitly allowing):

: 

Why this conflicts:
The first sentence frames meta-prompts as inferior, while the later framing accepts them as useful when combined with structure. The summary does not explicitly resolve that hierarchy.

===== Sentence A: =====

: 

Sentence B:

: 

Why this conflicts:
The first sentence reads as a blanket avoidance rule, while the second concedes practical effectiveness. The condition (“when unanchored”) is missing from the first sentence, creating an apparent contradiction.

===== Sentence A: =====

: 

Sentence B:

: 

Why this conflicts:
If recent instructions dominate behavior, then meta-prompts (which are often recent) are actually powerful, not weak. The summary does not reconcile dominance vs reliability.

===== Sentence A: =====

: 

Sentence B:

: 

Why this conflicts:
The first sentence emphasizes minimization; the second assigns them a foundational role. The summary does not clarify how minimal is still sufficient.

===== Sentence A: =====

: 

Sentence B:

: 

Why this conflicts:
Mode switches deliberately differentiate tasks. The summary does not clarify the distinction between structural reuse and mode variation, which can read as contradictory guidance.

===== Sentence A: =====

: 

Sentence B:

: 

Why this conflicts:
If recency dominates, then reliability is coming from placement and repetition, not the inherent superiority of charters. The causal explanation is incomplete.

==== The conflicts are not substantive disagreements, but missing qualifiers. ====
Most tensions resolve once you add:

: 

Your follow-up question correctly exposed that gap.