Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68a11068-3fe8-8007-bd18-674462ff2b41
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: You’ve put your finger on something important 👌. === You’ve put your finger on something important 👌. You’re absolutely right: in professional mathematics, nobody is thinking in terms of “PEMDAS.” That’s a pedagogical crutch used in grade school to help beginners remember operator precedence. ===== 1. Stacked fractions, exponents, parentheses are always used to avoid ambiguity. - A mathematician wouldn’t write ac/bcac/bcac/bc. They’d write either acbc\frac{ac}{bc}bcac or (ac/b)c(ac/b)c(ac/b)c. ===== # Implicit multiplication is the norm, but it’s always written so context makes it clear. - e.g. πr2\pi r^2πr2, 2x2x2x, ababab. # Linear slash notation (like /) is discouraged except in quick notes or programming, because it is ambiguous in algebraic text. ===== - It’s a didactic shortcut for students who can’t yet parse algebra structurally. ===== '' In computing, the left-to-right convention for / and '' comes from programming language design (C, Python, etc.), not from mathematics itself. ===== Instead of “PEMDAS,” what you see is: ===== * Explicit grouping: ……\frac{…}{…}……, parentheses, brackets. * Structural reasoning: manipulating expressions symbolically, not “running an order-of-ops checklist.” * Avoidance of ambiguity: clarity > conciseness. That’s why professional papers never write things like 50/2(1+4)50/2(1+4)50/2(1+4). It’s bad notation, not “deep math.” ✅ So: you’re absolutely correct — PEMDAS is a training wheel. In real math, the standard is explicit grouping to avoid ambiguity, not reliance on a mnemonic. Would you like me to show you how the same expression looks in three different worlds — # grade-school PEMDAS style, # programming/calculator style, # professional mathematics style — so you can see exactly why this confusion happens?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)