Editing Openai/6925d974-1c48-8003-8a9b-d62534f72e94 (section)

===== Detailed Rubric-Based Analysis =====

====== Pillar 1: Structural Integrity (IBC Framework) ======
* Introduction: Missing. The answer directly starts with factual data about the number of DRSCs. An ideal introduction should briefly define DRSCs and their constitutional/statutory rationale.
* Structure: Lists are present, but the narrative flow is weak. Subsections are not clearly demarcated, especially between role and limitations.
* Conclusion: Present, but it becomes moralistic (“duty to do welfare of people”) and not aligned with a neutral administrative tone.
* Brevity: Within word limits but contains repetitive and loosely written points.

====== Pillar 2: Addressing the Demand (Cardinal Rule) ======
* The question demands: Role of DRSCs in improving parliamentary effectiveness.
* Many points (e.g., “MPs are layman”, “cannot intervene in day-to-day business”) belong to limitations, but the role should link each function specifically to parliamentary effectiveness (scrutiny, accountability, deliberation, continuity).
* Subheadings based directly on keywords (“Role”, “Limitations”, “Way Forward”) would improve scannability.
* Some points (e.g., “opposition influencing welfare policies”) drift from the core demand.

====== Pillar 3: Content & Value-Addition (The Polity Trinity) ======
* Factual Accuracy: - “There are 24 DRSCs”: Correct. - Role points are broadly correct but lack precision.
* Authority (Articles): No mention of relevant articles such as Art. 107–111 (legislative process) or parliamentary control mechanisms.
* Judgments: None cited. While not mandatory, SC observations on committee systems (e.g., strengthening legislative scrutiny) could elevate analysis.
* Committees/Reports: Missing reference to Nolan Committee, National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC), or 2nd ARC, which strongly advocate strengthening parliamentary committees.

====== Pillar 4: Static–Current Affairs Synthesis ======
* No linkage to contemporary issues: - Decline in referral of bills to committees in recent Lok Sabhas. - Significant bills passed without committee scrutiny.
* Lacks references to real examples like GST Bill, Data Protection Bill, Farm Bills, etc.

====== Pillar 5: Presentation & Examiner-Centric Design ======
* Very little use of underlining or structuring tools.
* Bullet points are present but not logically tiered.
* Language slips into informal handwriting-style expressions; needs bureaucratic neutrality.