Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69173363-9fc0-8005-91f2-88c42aec9b99
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Here’s a quick side-by-side so you can see just how big the gap is: === Here’s a quick side-by-side so you can see just how big the gap is: | Aircraft | Typical Cruise Cabin Noise | Takeoff/Climb Spike | Notes | | ---------------------- | --------------------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Boeing 737 | 60–65 dB (front), 65–70 dB (rear) | 75–80 dB | Modern jet engines are far back, noise is mainly airflow and systems hum. | | King Air E90 | 85–90 dB | 95+ dB | Turboprops generate continuous prop/gearbox noise; ear protection strongly recommended on long legs. | | Cessna 414A Chancellor | 82–88 dB | 90+ dB | Piston twin—prop and engine vibration dominate; much louder than jets. | | Conversation Reference | ~60 dB | — | For context—737 forward cabin cruise is about conversation-level noise. | Key differences: * Jets like the 737 have engines mounted far behind most passengers, and aerodynamic noise is smoother. * Turboprops (King Air) and piston twins (Cessna 414) put propellers just a few feet from the cabin wall, making them inherently louder and more fatiguing. * In small aircraft, hearing protection is not just for comfort—it’s for long-term hearing health, especially for kids. If you’re planning a 3-hour flight with children, the noise in a King Air or Cessna 414 will be tiring without proper protection, whereas a 737 is generally fine without headsets. I can also show you a noise exposure time vs. hearing risk chart if you want to see how quickly those 80–90 dB levels add up.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)